PHGA 6458
Mind-Body Problem in Historical Context
Professor William Jaworski
Spring 2009
Tuesdays, 2-4

Modern philosophy began with the Scientific Revolution. The scientific ideas of Aristotle had dominated Western thought for over a thousand years when the sixteenth-century astronomer Nicolaus Copernicus proposed a new model of the universe. Contrary to Aristotle, Copernicus claimed that the earth orbited the Sun not vice versa. In order to prove the Copernican model of the universe true, Galileo Galilei and other leaders of the Scientific Revolution developed new tools and techniques for studying the natural world – tools and techniques that ultimately showed not just that Aristotle’s cosmology was wrong, but almost every aspect of Aristotelian science. The Scientific Revolution involved more than a rejection of Aristotelian science, however; it involved a rejection of Aristotelian philosophy as well. In its place people erected a new philosophy based on dichotomies: freedom versus determinism, fact versus value, mind versus body. These dichotomies are responsible for the problems of modern philosophy. The task of philosophy since the Scientific Revolution has been to resolve the tensions they generate – to explain how we can be free, mental, moral beings if we inhabit a universe that at a fundamental physical level has none of these features. Philosophy of mind tries to resolve the problems generated by the mind-body or mental-physical dichotomy. These are called mind-body problems. Mind-body problems are based on a distinction between mental phenomena and physical phenomena. The seventeenth-century philosopher René Descartes was chiefly responsible for introducing this sharp mental-physical dichotomy. After more than 300 years, philosophers continue to struggle with the problems this dichotomy generates. An adequate philosophical account of relationship between thought, feeling, and action, on the one hand, and events in the human nervous system, on the other, remains elusive.


This course examines mind-body problems in detail: what they are; their history and its relationship to the Scientific Revolution; the ways they have shaped and have been shaped by developments in the natural and social sciences; and the range of theories that try to solve them. We then consider the bold hypothesis that philosophy of mind as it’s been practiced since the seventeenth century might be founded on a mistake! We reexamine the Aristotelian philosophy of human nature that was abandoned in the wake of the Scientific Revolution, and consider some recent developments in metaphysics, philosophy of science, and philosophy of biology and neuroscience that suggest it might be possible to articulate that a contemporary version of Aristotelian theory that is capable of resolving mind-body problems. We then evaluate this theory over against its principal contemporary competitors: forms of emergentism, epiphenomenalism, and physicalism.


Assignments include several short (1-2 page) papers rehearsing the most important arguments in philosophy of mind, and a longer research paper.