Fordham University            The Jesuit University of New York
 


Back to University Regulations

The Fordham University Policy on Academic Integrity









The Fordham University Undergraduate Policy on Academic Integrity

A University, by its nature, strives to foster and recognize originality of thought, which can be recognized only when people produce work that is theirs alone and properly acknowledge information and ideas that are obtained from the work of others. It is therefore important that students must maintain the highest standards with regard to honesty, effort, and performance.

As a Jesuit, Catholic University, Fordham is committed to ensuring that all members of the academic community strive not only for excellence in scholarship but also for integrity of character.   In the pursuit of knowledge and personal development, it is imperative that students present their own ideas and insights for evaluation, critique and eventual reformulation. As part of this process, each student must acknowledge the intellectual contribution of others.

   I.      The Academic Integrity Statement

The following statement will be read at the academic orientation by all incoming freshmen and external transfer students  to  increase  their  awareness  of  the  importance  Fordham  attaches  to  integrity  within  the  acdemic community.

"As a student of Fordham University, I recognize that I am part of a community dedicated to the disciplined and rigorous pursuit of knowledge and communication of truth.  I therefore commit myself to the University Code of Conduct and upholding the highest standards of academic integrity.  Any work that I claim to be my own will be my own; I will give appropriate credit where credit is due; I will be fair and honest in all of my interactions with members of the Fordham community."

 

By being enrolled at Fordham University students are bound to comply with the University Code of Conduct, which includes, but is not limited to the following Standards of Academic Integrity.

 

 II.      Standards of Academic Integrity

Academic integrity is the pursuit of scholarly activity in an honest, truthful, and responsible manner. Violations of academic  integrity  include,  but  are  not  limited  to,  plagiarism,  cheating  on  exams,  falsification,  unapproved collaboration, and destruction of library materials.  Below are instances of violations with which all members of the academic community should be familiar.

A.      Plagiarism:

Plagiarism occurs when individuals attempt to present as their own what has come from another source.  Plagiarism takes place whether such theft is accidental or deliberate. It is no defense to claim that one has forgotten” to document ideas or material taken from another source.

Examples of plagiarism include, but are not limited to:

i.                     Using the ideas of another person, whether or not such ideas are paraphrased, from whatever source including oral, print, broadcast, or computer-mediated communication;

ii.                   Rewriting borrowed material by simply dropping a word here and there, substituting a few words for others, or moving around words or sentence;

iii.                  Presenting borrowed material, whether a phrase, sentence, or whole paragraphs without placing quotation marks around the borrowed material in the approved style;

iv.                  Presenting, as one’s own an assignment, paper, or computer program partially or wholly prepared by another person, whether by another student, friend, or by a business or on-line service that sells or distributes such papers and programs;

v.                    Failing to use proper citation for information obtained from print sources or the internet, according to citation criteria specified by the instructor or in cases where instructor guidance is not given, by standard manuals of style (e.g. The Chicago Manual of Style).

B.      Cheating

Cheating occurs when individuals use course materials, information or devices (e.g., programmable calculator, cell phone) when such is unauthorized or prohibited.

Examples of cheating include, but are not limited to:

i.                     Having or using unauthorized materials, information or an unauthorized device at an examination, test or quiz;

ii.                   Copying from another student at an examination, test or quiz, or copying another student’s assignment, data or laboratory report;

iii.                  Permitting another student to copy from an assignment, paper, computer program, project, examination, test or quiz;

iv.                  Obtaining and/or using an unauthorized examination, test, or quiz prior to its administration;

v.                    Having another person act as proxy to take an examination, test or quiz or to complete an assignment, paper, computer program, or project.

C.      Falsification

Falsification occurs when individuals make false statements that mislead others.
Examples of falsification include, but are not limited to:

i.                     The submission or presentation of a falsified excuse for an absence from a course requirement, examination, test or quiz;

ii.                   The presentation of false identification or credentials in order to gain admission to a course, examination, test, quiz or degree program;

iii.                  The creation of a false or misleading citation;

iv.                  The manipulation or falsification of data for an academic assignment.

D.      Unapproved Collaboration

Certain coursework and assignments such as team projects, papers, and laboratory work may involve collaboration. Unless expressly permitted or prescribed by the faculty member, students shall not engage in collaboration on graded assignments. It is the student's responsibility to ask for clarification from a faculty member to what extent, if at all, collaboration with others is allowed.

E.      Other Violations of Academic Integrity

Additional violations of academic integrity include, but are not limited to:

i.                     Theft, destruction, or tampering with library materials, audio and videotapes, computer hardware or software;

ii.                   Submission of a paper or project to more than one course during the time in which a student is attending Fordham University, without the explicit permission from all the instructors involved;

iii.                  Submission of work previously done in high school or at another institution, whether modified or not, without permission of the instructor.

III.      The Academic Integrity Committee

To foster a trusting environment that is essential for learning, it is the responsibility of both students and faculty to maintain and to promote the intellectual community.  To ensure that all members of that community are represented in the process, a committee comprised of three faculty members, three students and one academic administrator will be established for each college.  This Committee will oversee the procedures and appeals associated with courses taught in that college.

 Responsibilities. The responsibilities of the Academic Integrity Committee (AIC) are: i) to record and verify receipt of Violation Reports signed by the instructor and student; ii) to further investigate the incident if the student challenges the decision of the instructor and schedule a case review; iii) to report the violation to the appropriate Dean(s); iv) to provide annual reports of the academic integrity violations and final sanctions to the Dean of the College; v) to review periodically the functioning of the Committee, including Standards of Academic Integrity and Procedures and Appeals to determine if changes are needed. This oversight review shall be communicated to the Dean of the College; vii) to work with relevant student groups to develop workshops to promote and maintain academic integrity.

Membership. The Dean of College will solicit nominations for membership, including substitute faculty and students. The Dean will forward a list of recommendations to the Office of the Provost who will then appoint 3 faculty, 3 students and one administrator from the College and identify substitute faculty and students who are willing to serve, if needed. The Committee will be chaired by one member selected by the Dean of the College from among the three faculty and the administrator members. Agreement to serve on the Committee is a serious commitment.  Faculty members will serve a term of 3 years and student members will serve a term of two years with an initial staggering of terms to ensure continuity.  The  Chair of the Committee will serve in that capacity for a one year period with the possibility of yearly renewal.

Case Reviews.  Case reviews are to be conducted by a quorum comprised of the AIC Chair, 2 (additional) members of the faculty/administrator group, and 2 student members. The Chair will verify members attendance. A member of the AIC may be excused from a particular case review when a conflict of interest is disclosed to the chair. In the event that an academic integrity violation is filed against a senior just prior to graduation and the student challenges the instructor's claim, the chair of the AIC is empowered to convene an emergency ad hoc committee during senior week.  This ad hoc committee will consist of 2 faculty and 2 students.  Initially the AIC membership will be contacted, but if they are not available, then any  faculty member  and any student in the college may be asked to participate to ensure that 2 faculty and 2 students are present.  The ad hoc members will be asked to sign the confidentiality statement.

Confidentiality. Faculty, administrators and students engaged in academic integrity procedures involving academic integrity violations shall treat as confidential all information disclosed during such procedures, as well as the fact of occurrence of the case review. Persons nominated to the Academic Integrity Committee as members will only be permitted to serve after they sign a non-disclosure agreement that limits the discussion of cases to committee members and the College Deans on a "need to know basis" only.

 

IV.      Procedures

A.      When an instructor suspects that a student has engaged in academic dishonesty, the instructor shall hold a conference with the student regarding the basis for the suspected violation and the sanction(s) to be imposed according to the Academic Integrity Policy Statement (Section VI).

B.      The instructor shall fill out an Academic Integrity Violation Report and attach the appropriate documentation, including the syllabus. Both the instructor and student will sign the Report. When signing the report the student will either acknowledge that he/she has committed a violation of Academic Integrity Policy and accepts the instructor's sanctions, or indicate that he/she intends to challenge the instructor's claim, that is, that he/she committed a violation. The student cannot challenge the instructor's sanction for the offense. The sanction is primarily at the discretion of the instructor for the first offense and at the discretion of the dean for a second or third offense. Failure of the student to sign the Report without an expressed challenge made to the instructor's claim shall be deemed an acknowledgement of the violation and an acceptance of the sanctions.

C.      The Academic Integrity Violation Report and documentation will be sent directly to the Chair of the AIC. The Chair of the AIC will then notify the committee members that an Academic Integrity Report has been filed and apprise the members of the student's signed statement.

D.      If the student has signed an affirmative statement of violation and acceptance of the instructor's sanctions in accordance with this Policy Statement, the Dean of the student's home College will be notified as such. Under this circumstance, no case review by the AIC will be held and the case report is sent directly to the Dean of the home college.

E.      In all cases, the instructor will file a grade of 'NGR' pending the ctions of the AIC and notification from the AIC chair of any relevant sanction (i.e. an F for the course; Section VI) that is imposed by the Dean of the home college.

T
he Student Challenge and Case Review:

F.      If the student intends to challenge the instructor's claim, he/she must declare that intent to the AIC Chair in writing within two weeks of the initial conference between the instructor and the student. This challenge declaration must include a descriptive statement that explains his/her reasons for the challenge. The student cannot challenge the instructor's sanction for the offense. The sanction is primarily at the discretion of the instructor for the first offense and at the discretion of the dean for a second or third offense.

G.     Upon receipt of the student's declaration to challenge, the AIC Chair in consultation with the Department/Area Chair or Program Director will seek a second reviewer in order to conduct a blind review of the Academic Integrity Report and the student’s letter. The reviewer should be a member of the department or interdisciplinary program from which the report originated. The second reviewer will submit his/her evaluation to the Chair of the AIC. A second reviewer from outside the university will be utilized only when circumstances warrant.

H.      Upon receipt of the second reviewer’s evaluation, the Chair shall schedule a case review (Section III.C) with the AIC members.

I.         The AIC will review the case materials and the written statement (Section IV.F) of the student. Afer reviewing these, the Committee will deliberate and vote on whether a violation has occurred. The AIC chair will notify the student, the instructor, and, in cases of the affirmative, the Dean of the student's home college of the Committee’s evaluation.

Meeting with The Dean and Administration of Sanctions:

J.       Upon receipt of the AIC case report, the Dean of the student’s home college will meet with the student to discuss the evaluation of the AIC case review and impose the sanctions described in Section VI according to the level of offense. The Dean will also warn the student of sanctions for any future offenses. A report of the imposed sanctions will be made to the AIC for its records.

Record Keeping

K.      The AIC will keep for its records and analysis all reports and actions taken by the committee. These records are education records and subject to federal rules and regulations outlined in FERPA (Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act). Records kept for the purpose of analysis and program evaluation by the AIC will have all personal identifying information removed.

 V.      Procedure for a Student to Report an Academic Violation
If a student witnesses a violation of academic integrity or otherwise has reason to believe that a violation has occurred, he or she may choose among several possible courses of action.

A.      Talk with the student urging him/her to report himself/herself to the instructor of the course or to the Chair of the AIC.

B.      Discuss the observed action with the instructor, not naming those involved, to obtain guidance and determine if an observed act merits action under the Academic Integrity Policy.

C.      Submit a written report to the Chair of the AIC.  If the student wishes to remain anonymous, the AIC will honor that request during the initial inquiry prior to a case review.

VI.      Sanctions for Violations of Academic Integrity:

If a student is found in violation of academic integrity standards while an undergraduate at Fordham University, the following sanctions shall be imposed:

 A.      First Offense:

i.                     The student shall receive an F on the assignment/examination. The student may in addition receive an F in the course at the discretion of the instructor. In the event that the student receives an F in the course and subsequently elects to withdraw from the course prior to the withdrawal deadline, the student shall receive the grade of WF, a grade which is equivalent of an earned F in the cumulative quality point index.

ii.                   The case shall be documented in the student’s file, where it will remain until the time of the student’s graduation from the College, at which time the material will be removed from his or her file. Any records kept for the purpose of analysis and program evaluation by the AIC and not destroyed will have all personal identifying information removed. 

B.      Second Offense:

i.                     The student shall receive an F for the course and shall be subject to suspension or expulsion from the college, at the discretion of the Dean. In the event that the student receives an F in the course and subsequently elects to withdraw from the course prior to the withdrawal deadline, the student shall receive the grade of WF, a grade which is equivalent of an earned F in the cumulative quality point index.  If the student is expelled, the notation Withdrawn by the University will appear on his/her transcript.

ii.                   The case shall be documented in the student’s file, where it will remain until the time of the student’s graduation from the College, at which time the material will be removed from his or her file. Any records kept for the purpose of analysis and program evaluation by the AIC and not destroyed will have all personal identifying information removed. 

C.      Third Offense:

If a student is found guilty of a third violation of academic integrity, the student will receive an F for the course and will be expelled from the University, at the discretion of the Dean. In the event that the student receives an F in the course and subsequently elects to withdraw from the course prior to the withdrawal deadline, the student shall receive the grade of WF, a grade which is equivalent of an earned F in the cumulative quality point index.  If the student is expelled, the notation – Withdrawn by the University will appear on his/her transcript. 

VII.      The Right to Grieve Grades in Relationship to Violations of Academic Integrity:

Any other grades given for work in the same course, unless the grade itself is the sanction, can be grieved in accordance with the established College policy only after any and all questions of violations of academic integrity have been resolved through the processes stated above.

 


Updated on Wednesday, August 6, 2014

Site  | Directories
Submit Search Request