Fordham


IHSP

Medieval History


Selected Sources Full Text Sources Saints' Lives Law Texts Maps Medieval Films Search Help


Selected Sources Sections Studying History End of Rome Byzantium Islam Roman Church Early Germans Anglo-Saxons Celtic World Carolingians 10 C Collapse Economic Life Crusades Empire & Papacy France England Celtic States Nordic Europe Iberia Italy Eastern Europe Intellectual Life Medieval Church Jewish Life Social History Sex & Gender States & Society Renaissance Reformation Exploration
IHSP Credits

Internet Medieval Sourcebook:

Biblical Texts Related to Veneration of Relics and Comments by Christian Theologians


OLD TESTAMENT

Elisha's Bones, II Kings 13:20-22

Elisha died and was buried. Now Moabite raiders used to enter the country every spring. Once while some Israelites were burying a man, suddenly they saw a band of raiders; so they threw the man’s body into Elisha’s tomb. When the body touched Elisha’s bones, the man came to life and stood up on his feet. (2 Kings 13.20-22)

NEW TESTAMENT

Power Flows from Jesus' Clothes (Mark 5.25-349)

And a woman was there who had been subject to bleeding for twelve years. She had suffered a great deal under the care of many doctors and had spent all she had, yet instead of getting better she grew worse. When she heard about Jesus, she came up behind him in the crowd and touched his cloak, because she thought, “If I just touch his clothes, I will be healed.” Immediately her bleeding stopped and she felt in her body that she was freed from her suffering. At once Jesus realized that power had gone out from him. He turned around in the crowd and asked, “Who touched my clothes?”

“You see the people crowding against you,” his disciples answered, “and yet you can ask, ‘Who touched me?’” But Jesus kept looking around to see who had done it. Then the woman, knowing what had happened to her, came and fell at his feet and, trembling with fear, told him the whole truth. He said to her, “Daughter, your faith has healed you. Go in peace and be freed from your suffering.”(Mark 5.25-349)

The Shadows of the Apostles Cure People (Acts 5:12-16)

The apostles performed many signs and wonders among the people. And all the believers used to meet together in Solomon’s Colonnade. No one else dared join them, even though they were highly regarded by the people. Nevertheless, more and more men and women believed in the Lord and were added to their number. As a result, people brought the sick into the streets and laid them on beds and mats so that at least Peter’s shadow might fall on some of them as he passed by. Crowds gathered also from the towns around Jerusalem, bringing their sick and those tormented by impure spirits, and all of them were healed. (Acts 5:12-16)

Paul's Handkerchiefs Taken to the Sick (Acts 19.11-12)

God did extraordinary miracles through Paul, so that even handkerchiefs and aprons that had touched him were taken to the sick, and their illnesses were cured and the evil spirits left them. (Acts 19.11-12)

LIFE OF ST. POLYCARP

St Polycarp, a disciple of the Apostle John and the bishop of Smyrna, was martyred in Rome around the year A.D. 155 and an account was composed soon after known as the Martyrdom of Polycarp, in which we find this passage:

[After Bishop Polycarp was martyred in a Roman stadium] But when the adversary of the race of the righteous, the envious, malicious, and wicked one [Satan], perceived the impressive nature of his martyrdom, and [considered] the blameless life he had led from the beginning, and how he was now crowned with the wreath of immortality, having beyond dispute received his reward, he did his utmost that not the least memorial of him should be taken away by us [Christians], although many desired to do this, and to become possessors of his holy flesh. For this end he [Satan] suggested it to Nicetes, the father of Herod and brother of Alce, to go and entreat the governor not to give up his body to be buried, lest, said he, forsaking Him that was crucified, they begin to worship this one

This he said…being ignorant of this, that it is neither possible for us ever to forsake Christ, who suffered for the salvation of such as shall be saved throughout the whole world (the blameless one for sinners ), nor to worship any other. For Him indeed, as being the Son of God, we adore; but the martyrs, as disciples and followers of the Lord, we worthily love on account of their extraordinary affection towards their own King and Master, of whom may we also be made companions and fellow disciples!.Martyrdeom of Polycarp

CHURCH FATHERS

Jerome (4th Century)

We, it is true, refuse to worship or adore, I say not [just] the relics of the martyrs, but even the sun and moon, the angels and archangels, Cherubim and Seraphim and every name that is named, not only in this world but also in that which is to come. For we may not serve the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Still, we honour the relics of the martyrs, that we may adore Him whose martyrs they are. We honour the servants that their honour may be reflected upon their Lord who Himself says:— “he that receives you receives me." […] If the relics of the martyrs are not worthy of honour, how comes it that we read “precious in the sight of the Lord is the death of his saints?” (Letter 109, 1, 2)

Ambrose of Milan (Late 4th Century)

For after I had dedicated the basilica, many, as it were, with one mouth began to address me, and said: Consecrate this as you did the Roman basilica. And I answered: “Certainly I will if I find any relics of martyrs.” And at once a kind of prophetic ardour seemed to enter my heart. Why should I use many words? God favoured us, for even the clergy were afraid who were bidden to clear away the earth from the spot before the chancel screen of SS. Felix and Nabor. I found the fitting signs, and on bringing in some on whom hands were to be laid, the power of the holy martyrs became so manifest, that even whilst I was still silent, one was seized and thrown prostrate at the holy burial-place...

On the following day we translated the relics to the basilica called Ambrosian. During the translation a blind man was healed […] They [the Arians] deny that the blind man received sight, but he denies not that he is healed. He says: I who could not see now see. He says: I ceased to be blind, and proves it by the fact.

St. Augustine of Hippo (354-430)

Nevertheless the bodies of the dead are not on this account to be despised and left unburied; least of all the bodies of the righteous and faithful, which have been used by the Holy Ghost as His organs and instruments for all good works. For if the dress of a father, or his ring, or anything he wore, be precious to his children, in proportion to the love they bore him, with how much more reason ought we to care for the bodies of those we love, which they wore far more closely and intimately than any clothing? (City of God , I, 13)

But, nevertheless, we do not build temples, and ordain priests, rites, and sacrifices for these same martyrs; for they are not our gods, but their God is our God. Certainly we honor their reliquaries, as the memorials of holy men of God who strove for the truth even to the death of their bodies, that the true religion might be made known, and false and fictitious religions exposed. For if there were some before them who thought that these religions were really false and fictitious, they were afraid to give expression to their convictions. But who ever heard a priest of the faithful, standing at an altar built for the honor and worship of God over the holy body of some martyr, say in the prayers, I offer to thee a sacrifice, O Peter, or O Paul, or O Cyprian? for it is to God that sacrifices are offered at their tombs- the God who made them both men and martyrs, and associated them with holy angels in celestial honor; and the reason why we pay such honors to their memory is, that by so doing we may both give thanks to the true God of their victories, and, by recalling them afresh to remembrance, may stir ourselves up to imitate them by seeking to obtain like crowns and palms, calling to our help that same God on whom they called. (City of God Book VIII, 27)

But we cannot deny that many miracles were wrought to confirm that one grand and health-giving miracle of Christ's Ascension to heaven with the flesh in which He rose. For these most trustworthy books of ours contain in narrative both the miracles that were wrought and the creed which they were wrought to confirm. The miracles were published that they might produce faith, and the faith which they produced brought them into greater prominence. For they are read in congregations that they may be believed, and yet they would not be so read unless they were believed. For even now miracles are wrought in the name of Christ, whether by His sacraments or by the prayers or relics of His saints but they are not so brilliant and conspicuous as to cause them to be published with such glory as accompanied the former miracles..... (City of God XXII, 8)

The miracle which was wrought at Milan when I was there, and by which a blind man was restored to sight, could come to the knowledge of many; for not only is the city a large one, but also the emperor was there at the time, and the occurrence was witnessed by an immense concourse of people that had gathered to the bodies of the martyrs Protasius and Gervasius, which had long lain concealed and unknown, but were now made known to the bishop Ambrose in a dream, and discovered by him. By virtue of these remains the darkness of that blind man was scattered, and he saw the light of day.... (City of God XXII, 8)

When the bishop Projectus was bringing the relics of the most glorious martyr Stephen to the waters of Tibilis, a great concourse of people came to meet him at the shrine. There a blind woman entreated that she might be led to the bishop who was carrying the relics. He gave her the flowers he was carrying. She took them to her eyes, and forthwith saw. Those who were present were astounded, while she, with every expression of joy, preceded them, pursuing her way without further need of a guide.

Lucillus bishop of Sinita, in the neighborhood of the colonial town of Hippo, was carrying in procession some relics of the same martyr, which had been deposited in the castle of Sinita. A fistula under which he had long labored, and which his private physician was watching an opportunity to cut, was suddenly cured by the mere carrying of that sacred fardel- at least, afterwards there was no trace of it in his body.

Eucharius, a Spanish priest, residing at Calama, was for a long time a sufferer from stone. By the relics of the same martyr, which the bishop Possidius brought him, he was cured. Afterwards, the same priest, sinking under another disease, was lying dead, and already they were binding his hands, the priest's cloak having been brought from the oratory and laid upon the corpse.... (City of God XXII, 8)

To what do these miracles witness, but to this faith which preaches Christ risen in the flesh, and ascended with the same into heaven? For the martyrs themselves were martyrs, that is to say, witnesses of this faith, drawing upon themselves by their testimony the hatred of the world, and conquering the world not by resisting it, but by dying. For this faith they died, and can now ask their benefits from the Lord in whose name they were slain. For this faith their marvelous constancy was exercised, so that in these miracles great power was manifested as the result. For if the resurrection of the flesh to eternal life had not taken place in Christ, and were not to be accomplished in His people, as predicted by Christ, or by the prophets who foretold that Christ was to come, why do the martyrs possess such power? For whether God Himself wrought these miracles by that wonderful manner of working by which, though Himself eternal, He produces effects in time; or whether He wrought them by servants, and if so, whether He made use of the spirits of martyrs as He uses men who are still in the body, or effects all these marvel by means of angels, over whom He exerts an invisible, immutable, incorporeal sway, so that what is said to be done by the martyrs is done not by their operation, but only by their prayer and request; or whether, finally, some things are done in one way, others in another, and so that man cannot comprehend them- nevertheless these miracles attest this faith which preaches the resurrection of the flesh to eternal life. (City of God XXII, 9)

Here perhaps our adversaries will say that their gods also have done some wonderful things, of now they begin to compare their gods to our dead men. Or will they also say that they have gods taken from among dead men, such as Hercules, into the number of the Gods? But our martyrs are not our gods; for we know that the martyrs and we have both but one God, and that the same. Nor yet are the miracles which they maintain to have been done by means of their temples at all comparable to those which are done by the tombs of our martyrs. If they seem similar, their gods have been defeated by our martyrs as Pharaoh's magi were by Moses. In reality, the demons wrought these marvels with the same impure pride with which they aspired to be the gods of the nations; but the martyrs do these wonders, or rather God does them while they pray and assist, in order that an impulse may be given to the faith by which we believe that they are not our gods, but have, together with ourselves, one God. In fine, they built temples to these of theirs, and set up altars, and ordained priests, and appointed sacrifices; but to our martyrs we build, not temples as if they were gods, but monuments as to dead men whose spirits live with God. Neither do we erect altars at these monuments that we may sacrifice to the martyrs, but to the one God of the martyrs and of ourselves; and in this sacrifice they are named in their own place and rank as men of God who conquered the world by confessing Him, but they are not invoked by the sacrificing priest. For it is to God, not to them, he sacrifices, though he sacrifices at their monument; for he is God's priest, not theirs. The sacrifice itself, too, is the body of Christ, which is not offered to them, because they themselves are this body. Which then can more readily be believed to work miracles? They who wish themselves to be reckoned gods by those on whom they work miracles, or those whose sole object in working any miracle is to induce faith in God, and in Christ also as God? They who wished to turn even their crimes into sacred rites, or those who are unwilling that even their own praises be consecrated, and seek that everything for which they are justly praised be ascribed to the glory of Him in whom they are praised? For in the Lord their souls are praised. Let us therefore believe those who both speak the truth and work wonders. For by speaking the truth they suffered, and so won the power of working wonders. And the leading truth they professed is that Christ rose from the dead, and first showed in His own flesh the immortality of the resurrection which He promised should be ours, either in the beginning of the world to come, or in the end of this world. (City of God XXII, 10)

The remains of Protasius and Gervasius

It was at that time too that you [God] revealed to your bishop Ambrose in a vision the place where the bodies of the martyrs Protasius and Gervasius were hidden. All these years you had preserved them incorrupt in your secret treasury, so that when the time came you could bring them to light to thwart the fury of a woman [Justina, the mother of the Emperor Valentinian]- a mere woman, but one who ruled an empire. For after the bodies had been discovered and dug up, they were carried to Ambrose's basilica with the honor that was due to them. On the way several persons who were tormented by evil spirits were cured, for even the devils acknowledged the holy relics. But this was not all. There was also a man who had been blind for many years, a well-known figure in the city. He asked why the crowd was running with joy, and when they told him the reason, he leaped to his feet and begged his guide to lead him where the bodies lay. When he reached the place, he asked to be allowed to touch the bier with his handkerchief, for it was the bier of your saints, 'whose death is dear in your sight [Ps. 115:15]." No sooner had he done this and put the handkerchief to his eyes than his sight was restored. The news spread. Your praises rang out loud and clear, and although this miracle did not convert the mind of your enemy, Justina, to sound beliefs, at least it restrained her from the madness of persecution. (Confessions IX,7)

MEDIEVAL HISTORIANS

The Venerable Bede (8th Century)

The Missionary activities of Willobord

On their first arrival in Frisia, as soon as Wilbrord learned that the prince had granted him permission to preach, he hurried to Rome, where Pope Sergius then ruled the apostolic see, in order to obtain his approval and blessing on the evangelistic work he wished to undertake. He also hoped to obtain from him relics of the blessed Apostles and martyrs of Christ, so that when he had destroyed the idols and built churches among the people to whom he preached, he might have the relics of the saints ready to put in them. And when he had deposited them, he intended to dedicate these places fittingly in honor of each of the saints whose relics they were. (Ecclesiastical History, V, 11):

Bernard of Angers (early 11th Century)

There are very many terrible things, so numerous that they are indescribable, which divine justice works upon those who slander St. Faith. Of these, I will shortly relate one case, certainly a miracle, after I have said a word about the image of the holy martyr. For in fact it is an old custom and an ancient habit, in the whole country of the Auvergne, whether in the Rouergue or Toulouse, as well as in the surrounding countryside, that people erect a statue for their own saint, of gold or silver or some other metal, in which the head of the saint or a rather important part of the body is reverently preserved. To wise men this may seem to be full of superstition if not an outrage, for it seems as if the rites of the gods of ancient cultures, or rather of demons, are being observed. To me also the matter seemed perverse and contrary to Christian law, when for the first time I examined the statue of St. Gerald placed above the altar, gaudy with the purest gold and with most precious stones, an image made with such precision to the face of the human form that it seems to see with an attentive, observant gaze the great many peasants seeing it and to gently grant with reflecting eyes the prayers of those praying before it. And soon, smiling to my Bernarius (to my shame), I burst forth with this sentence in Latin, "Brother, what do you think of this idol? If it were a statue of Jupiter or Mars would they make themselves so humble before it?" Then and there Bernarius was already guided in his opinion. He mocked ingeniously enough and he found fault with it underneath his praise. And not at all undeservedly, for where the cult of the only high and true God ought to be practiced correctly, it seems an impious crime and an absurdity that a plaster or wooden or bronze statue is allowed to be made. The only exception is the crucifix, an image either carved or modeled, so full of emotion for the purpose of celebrating the memory of our Lord's passion that the holy and universal church accepts it. However, the memory of the saints ought to be shown to human sight only by truthful writing in a book or by shadowy images depicted on painted walls. For we allow the statues of saints for no reason, unless because of ancient incorrect practice and the unconquerable and inborn custom of simple people. This incorrect practice has such influence in the places I mentioned earlier that if I said anything openly then against the image of St. Gerald, I would probably have been punished as if I had committed a great crime.

Finally after the third day we arrived at Conques. When we had entered the monastery, fate brought it about, quite by chance, that the secluded place in which the revered image is preserved had been opened up. We stood nearby, in such a narrowness of place because of the multitude of people on the ground at her feet that we were not even able to move forward. Although it was annoying to me, I stood looking at the image and I uttered prayerful words exactly in this way: "St. Faith, part of whose body rests in the present likeness, help me on the day of judgment." And, with a sidelong smile I looked back at my student Bernarius, thinking it absurd, of course, and far removed from the limits of reason that so many rational beings should kneel before a must and insensate thing. In truth my idle speaking and smallmindedness up to this time did not arise from a good heart. For it was smallmindedness to consider the holy image, which is consulted not as an idol that ought to receive sacrifices, but on account of the memory of the revered martyr in honor of the high God, despicable or contemptible as I have called the statues of Venus or Diana. And afterwards I was very sorry that I had behaved so foolishly against the saint of God.

For in fact among the other reports of miracles, Adalgerius (then deacon, and afterwards, as I have heard, abbot), a venerable and upright man, told me about a certain cleric named Odalricus. One day when the venerable image had been moved to another place for some necessary reason, that man had so perverted the hearts of men that he had curbed the crowd of offerings, distracting greatly from the holy martyr and spreading some foolishness or other about her image. However, on the following night, when he had fallen asleep, a lady seemed to stand before him in a dream of terrifying impressiveness, saying, "And you, worst of criminals, why have you dared to find fault with my image?" After she had said these words, using a rod that she seemed to carry in her right hand, she left behind a beaten enemy. That man remembered and told this story as long as he lived. Thereafter no room was left for argument as to whether the shaped image of St. Faith ought to be considered an object for veneration, because it was well known and certain that whoever criticized the statue in no way detracted from the holy martyr by this. Nor did any doubt linger as to whether the image was a foul idol where an abominable rite of sacrifice or of consulting as of an oracle was practiced. It was clear that the image represented the pious memory of the holy virgin before which quite properly and with abundant remorse, her intercession, effective against sin, is implored. Moreover, in this reliquary, the completely intact head of a great martyr is preserved, so that it is without doubt one of the outstanding pearls of the heavenly Jerusalem. Because of her merits, divine goodness performs such great feats that I have neither known nor heard of the like being done through any other saint, at least not in these times. Therefore the image of St. Faith ought not to be destroyed or criticized, for it seems that no one lapses back into pagan errors because of it, nor does it seem that the virtues of the saints are lessened by it, nor indeed does it seem that any aspect of religion suffers through it.

And since I have already explained some things about the holy image, I wish to add another miracle about it. When in a certain famine (the cause of which I do not know), the revered image in which the head of the holy martyr is preserved was carried outside in a huge procession, it happened by chance that a certain man coming to meet it crossed over very near to it. When he had seen the effigy radiant with glowing reddish gold and blazing gems, he was blinded by a cloud of greed. So he said, "Oh, if only that image would slip from the shoulders of the bearers and fall to the ground! No one would gather up a greater portion of the shattered stone and broken gold than I." While the foolish man was muttering these words, the mule on which he was sitting bent its head downward between its front legs and raised with his hind legs so that they flew over the head of the rider. The man ended up in the mud under the heavy hindquarters of the mule. Some people ran quickly, lest he suffocate, and freed him from the calamitous weight. Then all gave thanks to God, who protects his own saints even from silly talk.

But even long before these events, yet in our own time, there occurred a most felicitous miracle concerning golden doves. If there is time for hearing and if you kindly people will admit a true story into the secret places of your heart, then I shall immediately tell you of a miracle about the fashioning of the famous image which is called by the inhabitants of the place, the Majesty of St. Faith. It is made of the finest gold, and, through portions of the garments, as the judgment of the craftsman demanded, it is becomingly adorned with gems delicately and carefully inserted. The band about the head of the statue also displays gems and gold. Golden bracelets on golden arms, a low golden stool under golden feet, such a throne that there is nothing in it other than precious stones, nothing except the best gold is visible, and also above the tops of the supports that project upward at the front, two doves made of gems and gold are seen to adorn the beauty of the whole throne. About them it is now necessary to relate a miraculous event. When Bernardus (then abbot of Beaulieu and afterwards bishop of Cahors) owned the doves, he was admonished in dreams by St. Faith that he should give them to her. Since he had refused to do this, he was prevailed upon again and again in the same way. Finally, feeling that the warning came from God, he took other gold of the same weight with him and set out for Conques. There he offered this gold to God and to his saint and returned, certain that St. Faith was pleased because of the equality of the weight. But in fact when once more he was sleeping one night, the same vision appeared, no less insistent that the doves be given to her, declaring that he would not be able to make satisfaction in any way, even if he paid out all of his gold, unless he would give her the doves as well. Finally the reluctant man was compelled to deliver the golden doves, just as though they had only been entrusted to him for safekeeping, and he placed their remarkable beauty on the supports of St. Faith's throne. (The Miracles of St. Faith

A certain noble matron heard of the renown of the miracles of St. Faith and decided to go to Conques. When she began the journey, after she had already gone a little distance, she recalled that St. Faith kept asking in dreams from the rings of travelers. So she turned her foot back, drew her own ring from her finger, and entrusted it for safekeeping to the chambermaid whom she had summoned. "Hold this," she said, "and keep it safe until I return, lest perhaps St. Faith snatch it away if I take it with me to Conques." Now, of course, she thought she was being clever- as if to think that a precaution of any kind would be able to deflect the foreknowledge of God, who foresees all things before they happen!

The woman went to Conques, she fulfilled her obligation to pray, and she returned home in peace. On the following night, a maidenly shape appeared to the sleeping woman. When asked, the maiden said that she was St. Faith and, without a pause, warned with imperious authority that the ring had best be given to her. Then she suggested to the woman, who denied that she had a ring, that she was the very woman who, when leaving for Conques, entrusted her ring to a chambermaid in order to avoid giving it to St. Faith. When morning came and the woman awoke she decided that the divine vision had only been a fantasy, a silly dream. But how much longer shall I delay the end of my story? Immediately the woman began to burn with such a fiery fever through her whole body that she was scarcely able to endure it for an hour. After three days of fever she regained her consciousness, and, aware of her guilt, confessed her negligence. Soon thereafter, while she was ordering that a horse be saddled so that she could make a return journey to Conques, the excessive surge of fever diminished. And so the woman set out healthy and returned rejoicing counting it not a small gain to exchange a ring for her health.

Guibert of Nogent (12th century)

Meanwhile, following the customary way, such as it is, of raising money, they began to carry around the feretories and relics of the saints. And so it came to pass that the Gracious Judge, Who comforts with His pity in heaven those whom He reproves below, showed many miracles where they went. Now they were carrying, along with some box of undistinguished memory, a splendid little reliquary which contained parts of the robe of the Virgin Mother and of the sponge lifted to the lips of the Savior and of His Cross. Whether it contained some of the hair of Our Lady, I do not know. It was made of gold and gems, and verses written on it in gold told of the wonders within.... In the city of Angers, there was a woman who had married as a little girl, and had worn the ring placed on her finger at that early age day and night, as she said, without ever taking it off. As years went by and the girl grew larger in body, the flesh rising up on each side of the ring had almost covered the metal, and consequently she had given up all hop of getting it off her finger. When the holy relics came there and she went with other women after the sermon to make her offering, as she held out her hand to place the money she had brought on the relics, the ring cracked and slipped from her hand before them. When the people, and especially the women, saw that the Virgin Mother had granted the woman such a favor, something she had not dared to ask for, the offerings of money by the people and of rings and necklaces by the women were beyond description. (Memoirs , III, 12)

Abbot Suger (12th Century)

Through a fortunate circumstance attending this singular smallness- the number of faithful growing and frequently gathering to seek the intercession of the Saints- the aforesaid basilica had come to suffer grave inconveniences. Often on feast days, completely filled, it disgorged through all its doors the excess of crowds as they moved in opposite directions, and the outward pressure of the foremost ones not only prevented those attempting to enter from entering but also expelled those who had already entered. At time you could see, a marvel to behold, that the crowed multitude offered so much resistance to those who strove to flock in to worship and kiss the holy relics, the Nail and Crown of the Lord, that no one among the countless thousands of people because of their density could move a foot; that no one, because of their congestion, could [do] anything but stand like a marble statue, stay benumbed or, as a last resort, scream. The distress of the women, however, was so great and so intolerable that [you could see] how they, squeezed in by the mass of strong men as in a winepress, exhibited bloodless faces as in imagined death; how they cried out horrible as though in labor; how several of them, miserably trodden underfoot [but they], lifted by the pious assistance of men above the heads of the crowd, marched forward as though clinging to a pavement; and how many others, gasping with their last breath, panted in the cloisters of the brethren to the despair of everyone. Moreover the brethren who were showing the tokens of the Passion of Our Lord to the visitors had to yield to their anger and rioting and many a time, having no place to turn, escaped with the relics. (De Consecratione , II)

MEDIEVAL THEOLOGIANS

Thomas Aquinas (13th Century)

Now it is evident that we are bound to hold in veneration the saints of God as being members of Christ, sons and friends of God and our advocates with him. We are equally bound, therefore, memory of them, to accord due honor to any of their relics; and this is primarily true of their bodies, which were the temples and instruments of the Holy Spirit, dwelling and acting within them, and which are to be made like the body of Christ by glorious resurrection. It is for this reason that God himself grants honors to their relics by performing miracles when they are present....

...This was the argument of Vigilantius, cited by Jerome, "We are observing the introduction, under the guise of religion, of something not very different from a pagan ritual. These people can be seen kissing and adoring little piles of some kind of dust in tiny bottles, wrapped up in precious cloth." In rebuttal Jerome writes, "We do not venerate, by latria, that is, either the sun or moon or the angels; far less the relics of the martyrs. We pay honor to the martyr's relics only so that we may venerate him whose martyrs they are; we pay honor to the servants only so that the servants' honor may glorify their Lord." Accordingly, when we honor the relics of the saints we do not fall into the error of those pagans who offered divine worship to the dead. (Summa Theologiae , 3a, 25, 6:)

MODERN CATHOLIC TEACHING

In modern Catholicism the cultus of relics is considerable less emphasised. The official compendium of doctrine, the Catechism of the Catholic Church mentions the subject once.

Besides sacramental liturgy and sacramentals, catechesis must take into account the forms of piety and popular devotions among the faithful. The religious sense of the Christian people has always found expression in various forms of piety surrounding the Church’s sacramental life, such as the veneration of relics, visits to sanctuaries, pilgrimages, processions, the stations of the cross, religious dances, the rosary, medals, etc. (CCC 1674)


Source:

https://aleteia.org/2013/09/17/the-ancient-biblical-christian-practice-of-venerating-relics/

https://shamelesspopery.com/what-scripture-says-about-using-relics/

http://employees.oneonta.edu/farberas/arth/arth212/relics.html

This text is part of the Internet Medieval Sourcebook. The Sourcebook is a collection of public domain and copy-permitted texts related to medieval and Byzantine history. Unless otherwise indicated the specific electronic form of the document is copyright. Permission is granted for electronic copying, distribution in print form for educational purposes and personal use. If you do reduplicate the document, indicate the source. No permission is granted for commercial use.

© Paul Halsall, January 2023
[email protected]


The Internet Medieval Sourcebook is part of the Internet History Sourcebooks Project. The Internet History Sourcebooks Project is located at the History Department of  Fordham University, New York. The Internet Medieval Sourcebook, and other medieval components of the project, are located at the Fordham University Center for Medieval Studies.The IHSP recognizes the contribution of Fordham University, the Fordham University History Department, and the Fordham Center for Medieval Studies in providing web space and server support for the project. The IHSP is a project independent of Fordham University.   Although the IHSP seeks to follow all applicable copyright law, Fordham University is not the institutional owner, and is not liable as the result of any legal action.

© Site Concept and Design: Paul Halsall created 26 Jan 1996: latest revision 12 April 2024 [CV]