Herodotus:
              from The History, c. 430 B.C., I.56-59
            These were the Spartans and the Athenians, the former of Doric, the latter of Ionic
              blood. And indeed these two nations held from earliest times the most distinguished place
              in Hellas, the one being a Pelasgic, the other a Hellenic people, and the one never having
              quitted its original seats, while the other had been excessively migratory...What the
              language of the Pelasgi was I cannot say with any certainty. If, however, we may form a
              conjecture....we must pronounce that the Pelasgi spoke a barbarous language. If this were
              really so, and the entire Pelasgic race spoke the same tongue, the Athenians, who were
              certainly Pelasgi, must have changed their language at the same time that they passed into
              the Hellenic body...The Hellenic race has never, since its first origin, changed its
              speech. This at least seems evident to me. It was a branch of the Pelasgic, which
              separated from the main body, and at first was scanty in numbers and of little power; but
              it gradually spread and increased to a multitude of nations, chiefly by the voluntary
              entrance into its ranks of numerous tribes of barbarians. The Pelasgi, on the other hand,
              were, as I think, a barbarian race which never greatly multiplied.
          
            
                Thucydides: 
              from The History of the Peloponnesian War, c. 404 B.C., II.5
            In the days of Kecrops and the first kings, down to the reign of Theseos, Attica was
              divided into communes, having their own town halls and magistrates. Except in case of
              alarm, the whole people did not assemble in council under the king, but administered their
              own affairs, and advised together in their several townships. Some of them at times even
              went to war with the king, as the Eleusinians under Eumolpos with King Erectheos. But when
              Theseos came to the throne, he, being a powerful as well as a wise ruler, among other
              improvements in the administration of the country, dissolved the councils and separate
              governments, and united all the inhabitants of Attica in the present city, establishing
              one council and town hall. They continued to live on their own lands, but he compelled
              them to resort to Athens as their metropolis [i.e., "mother-city"],
              and henceforward they were all inscribed in the roll of her citizens. A great city thus
              arose which was handed down by Theseos to his descendants, and from his day to this the
              Athenians have regularly celebrated the national festival of the Synoikia, or
              "union of the communes," in honor of the goddess Athena. 
      
            
                Plutarch: 
                  from The Life of Theseus, c. 110 CE
            Now, after the death of his father Aigeos, forming in his mind a great and wonderful
              design, he gathered together all the inhabitants of Attica into one town, and made them
              one people of one city, whereas before they lived dispersed, and were not easy to assemble
              upon any affair for the common interest. Nay, differences and even wars often occurred
              between them, which he by his persuasions appeased, going from township to township, and
              from tribe to tribe. And those of a more private and mean condition readily embracing such
              good advice, to those of greater power he promised a commonwealth without monarchy---a
              democracy, or people's government---in which he should only be continued as their
              commander in war and the protector of their laws, all things else being equally
              distributed among them; and by this means brought a part of them over to his proposal. 
            He then dissolved all the distinct statehouses, council halls, and magistracies, and
              built one common state-house and council hall on the site of the present upper town, and
              gave the name of Athens to the whole state, ordaining a common feast and sacrifice,
              which he called Pan-Athenaia, or the sacrifice of all the united Athenians. He
              instituted also another sacrifice called Metoikia, or Feast of Migration, which is
              yet celebrated on the sixteenth day of Hecatombaion. Then, as he had promised, he laid
              down his regal power and proceeded to order a commonwealth, entering upon this great work
              not without advice from the gods....Farther yet designing to enlarge his city, he invited
              all strangers to come and enjoy equal privileges with the natives...Yet he did not suffer
              his state, by the promiscuous multitude that flowed in, to be turned into confusion and he
              left without any order or degree, but he was the first that divided the Athenian
              Commonwealth into three distinct ranks, the noblemen, the farmers, and the artisans. To
              the nobility he committed the care of religion, the choice of magistrates, the teaching
              and dispensing of the laws, and interpretation and direction in all sacred matters; the
              whole city being, as it were, reduced to an exact equality, the nobles excelling the rest
              in honor, the farmers in profit, and the artisans in number. He also coined money, and
              stamped it with the image of an ox, either in memory of the Marathon bull, or of the
              Minotaur, both of whom he vanquished; or else to put his people in mind to follow animal
              husbandry; and from this coin came the expression so frequent among the Hellenes, of a
              thing being worth ten or a hundred oxen. After this he joined Megara to Attica...
            About this time, Menestheos (the son of Peteos, grandson of Orneos, and great-grandson
              of Erechtheos), the first man that is recorded to have affected popularity and ingratiated
              himself with the multitude, stirred up and exasperated the most eminent men of the city,
              who had long borne a secret grudge to Theseos, conceiving that he had robbed them of their
              several little kingdoms and lordships, and having pent them all up in one city, was using
              them as his subjects and slaves. He put also the meaner people into commotion, telling
              them that, deluded with a mere dream of liberty, they were actually deprived of both that
              and of their proper homes and religious usages; and that instead of many good and gracious
              kings of their own, they had given themselves up to be lorded over by a newcomer and a
              stranger....and after Theseos death---by accident or misadventure---Menestheos ruled in
              Athens as king.
          
            
                Aristotle:
              from The Athenian Constitution, c. 330 BCE
            Not only was the constitution at this time oligarchical in every respect, but the
              poorer classes---men, women, and children---were in absolute slavery to the rich. They
              were known as pelatai and also as hectemori, because they cultivated the
              lands of the rich for a sixth part of the produce. The whole country was in the hands of a
              few persons, and if the tenants failed to pay their rent, they were liable to be haled
              into debt-slavery and their children with them. Their persons were mortgaged to their
              creditors, a custom which prevailed until the time of Solon, who was the first to appear
              as a leader of the people. Bu the hardest and bitterest part of the condition of the
              masses was the fact that they had no share in the offices then existing under the
              constitution. At the same time they were discontented with every other feature of their
              lot; for, to speak generally, they had no part nor share in anything. 
        
          
            Herodotus, The History, George Rawlinson, trans., (New York: Dutton & Co.,
              1862);
            Plutarch, Plutarch's Lives, (The "Dryden Plutarch"), (London: J.M.
              Dent & Sons, Ltd., 1910); 
            Fred Morrow Fling, ed., A Source Book of Greek History, (Boston: D. C. Heath,
              1907), pp. 77-79.
            Scanned by: J. S. Arkenberg, Dept. of History, Cal. State Fullerton. Prof. Arkenberg
              has modernized the text.