Modern History Sourcebook: Duc de Saint-Simon: The Court of
Louis XIV          
           
   The Duc de Saint-Simon resided for many years at Versailles.
    He left an account of Life there.  
    
   The Court 
    
   His natural talents were below mediocrity; but he had a mind capable
    of improvement, of receiving polish, of assimilating what was
    best in the minds of others without slavish imitation; and he
    profited greatly throughout his life from having associated with
    the ablest and wittiest persons, of both sexes, and of various
    stations. He entered the world (if I may use such an expression
    in speaking of a King who had already completed his twenty-third
    year), at a fortunate moment, for men of distinction abounded.
    His Ministers and Generals at this time, with their successors
    trained in their schools, are universally acknowledged to have
    been the ablest in Europe; for the domestic troubles and foreign
    wars under which France had suffered ever since the death of Louis
    XIII had brought to the front a number of brilliant names, and
    the Court was made up of capable and illustrious personages....
    Glory was his passion, but he also liked order and regularity
    in all things; he was naturally prudent, moderate, and reserved;
    always master of his tongue and his emotions. Will it be believed?
    he was also naturally kind-hearted and just. God had given him
    all that was necessary for him to be a good King, perhaps also
    to be a fairly great one. All his faults were produced by his
    surroundings. In his childhood he was so much neglected that no
    one dared go near his rooms. He was often heard to speak of those
    times with great bitterness; he used to relate how, through the
    carelessness of his attendants, he was found one evening in the
    basin of a fountain in the Palais-Royal gardens.... 
   
   His Ministers, generals, mistresses, and courtiers soon found
    out his weak point, namely, his love of hearing his own praises.
    There was nothing he liked so much as flattery, or, to put it
    more plainly, adulation; the coarser and clumsier it was, the
    more he relished it. That was the only way to approach him; if
    he ever took a liking to a man it was invariably due to some lucky
    stroke of flattery in the first instance, and to indefatigable
    perseverance in the same line afterwards. His Ministers owed much
    of their influence to their frequent opportunities for burning
    incense before him....  
   
   It was this love of praise which made it easy for Louvois to engage
    him in serious wars, for he persuaded him that he had greater
    talents for war than any of his Generals, greater both in design
    and in execution, and the Generals themselves encouraged him in
    this notion, to keep in favour with him. I mean such Generals
    as Condé and Turenne; much more, of course, those who came
    after them. He took to himself the credit of their successes with
    admirable complacency, and honestly believed that he was all his
    flatterers told him. Hence arose his fondness for reviews, which
    he carried so far that his enemies called him, in derision, "the
    King of reviews"; hence also his liking for sieges, where
    he could make a cheap parade of bravery, and exhibit his vigilance,
    forethought, and endurance of fatigue; for his robust constitution
    enabled him to bear fatigue marvellously; he cared nothing for
    hunger, heat, cold, or bad weather. He liked also, as he rode
    through the lines, to hear people praising his dignified bearing
    and fine appearance on horseback. His campaigns were his favourite
    topic when talking to his mistresses. He talked well, expressed
    himself clearly in well-chosen language; and no man could tell
    a story better. His conversation, even on the most ordinary subjects,
    was always marked by a certain natural dignity. 
   
   His mind was occupied with small things rather than with great,
    and he delighted in all sorts of petty details, such as the dress
    and drill of his soldiers; and it was just the same with regard
    to his building operations, his household, and even his cookery.
    He always thought he could teach something of their own craft
    even to the most skilful professional men; and they, for their
    part, used to listen gratefully to lessons which they had long
    ago learnt by heart. He imagined that all this showed his indefatigable
    industry; in reality, it was a great waste of time, and his Ministers
    turned it to good account for their own purposes, as soon as they
    had learnt the art of managing him; they kept his attention engaged
    with a mass of details, while they contrived to get their own
    way in more important matters. 
   
   His vanity, which was perpetually nourished - for even preachers
    used to praise him to his face from the pulpit - was the cause
    of the aggrandisement of his Ministers. He imagined that they
    were great only through him, mere mouthpieces through which he
    expressed his will; consequently he made no objection when they
    gradually encroached on the privileges of the greatest noblemen.
    He felt that he could at any moment reduce them to their original
    obscurity; whereas, in the case of a nobleman, though he could
    make him feel the weight of his displeasure, he could not deprive
    him or his family of the advantages due to his birth. For this
    reason he made it a rule never to admit a seigneur to his
    Councils, to which the Duke de Beauvilliers was the only exception....  
   
   But for the fear of the devil, which, by God's grace, never forsook
    him even in his wildest excesses, he would have caused himself
    to be worshipped as a deity. He would not have lacked worshippers....  
   
   
   Life at Versailles 
    
   Very early in the reign of Louis XIV the Court was removed from
    Paris, never to return. The troubles of the minority had given
    him a dislike to that city; his enforced and surreptitious flight
    from it still rankled in his memory; he did not consider himself
    safe there, and thought cabals would be more easily detected if
    the Court was in the country, where the movements and temporary
    absences of any of its members would be more easily noticed....
    No doubt that he was also influenced by the feeling that he would
    be regarded with greater awe and veneration when no longer exposed
    every day to the gaze of the multitude. 
   
   His love-affair with Mademoiselle de la Vallière, which
    at first was covered as far as possible with a veil of mystery,
    was the cause of frequent excursions to Versailles. This was at
    that time at small country house, built by Louis XIII to avoid
    the unpleasant necessity, which had sometimes befallen him, of
    sleeping at a wretched wayside tavern or in a windmill, when benighted
    out hunting in the forest of St. Leger.... The visits of Louis
    XIV becoming more frequent, he enlarged the château by
    degrees till its immense buildings afforded better accommodation
    for the Court than was to be found at St. Germain, where most
    of the courtiers had to put up with uncomfortable lodgings in
    the town. The Court was therefore removed to Versailles in 1682,
    not long before the Queen's death. The new building contained
    an infinite number of rooms for courtiers, and the King liked
    the grant of these rooms to be regarded as a coveted privilege.  
   
   He availed himself of the frequent festivities at Versailles,
    and his excursions to other places, as a means of making the courtiers
    assiduous in their attendance and anxious to please him; for he
    nominated beforehand those who were to take part in them, and
    could thus gratify some and inflict a snub on others. He was conscious
    that the substantial favours he had to bestow were not nearly
    sufficient to produce a continual effect; he had therefore to
    invent imaginary ones, and no one was so clever in devising petty
    distinctions and preferences which aroused jealousy and emulation.
    The visits to Marly later on were very useful to him in this way;
    also those to Trianon, where certain ladies, chosen beforehand,
    were admitted to his table. It was another distinction to hold
    his candlestick at his coucher; as soon as he had finished
    his prayers he used to name the courtier to whom it was to be
    handed, always choosing one of the highest rank among those present....  
   
   Not only did he expect all persons of distinction to be in continual
    attendance at Court, but he was quick to notice the absence of
    those of inferior degree; at his lever, his coucher, his meals, in the gardens of Versailles (the only place where
    the courtiers in general were allowed to follow him), he used
    to cast his eyes to right and left; nothing escaped him, he saw
    everybody. If any one habitually living at Court absented himself
    he insisted on knowing the reason; those who came there only for
    flying visits had also to give a satisfactory explanation; any
    one who seldom or never appeared there was certain to incur his
    displeasure. If asked to bestow a favour on such persons he would
    reply haughtily: "I do not know him"; of such as rarely
    presented themselves he would say, "He is a man I never see";
    and from these judgements there was no appeal. 
   
   He always took great pains to find out what was going on in public
    places, in society, in private houses, even family secrets, and
    maintained an immense number of spies and tale-bearers. These
    were of all sorts; some did not know that their reports were carried
    to him; others did know it; there were others, again, who used
    to write to him directly, through channels which he prescribed;
    others who were admitted by the backstairs and saw him in his
    private room. Many a man in all ranks of life was ruined by these
    methods, often very unjustly, without ever being able to discover
    the reason; and when the King had once taken a prejudice against
    a man, he hardly ever got over it.... 
   
   No one understood better than Louis XIV the art of enhancing the
    value of a favour by his manner of bestowing it; he knew how to
    make the most of a word, a smile, even of a glance. If he addressed
    any one, were it but to ask a trifling question or make some commonplace
    remark, all eyes were turned on the person so honored; it was
    a mark of favour which always gave rise to comment.... 
   
   He loved splendour, magnificence, and profusion in all things,
    and encouraged similar tastes in his Court; to spend money freely
    on equipages and buildings, on feasting and at cards, was a sure
    way to gain his favour, perhaps to obtain the honour of a word
    from him. Motives of policy had something to do with this; by
    making expensive habits the fashion, and, for people in a certain
    position, a necessity, he compelled his courtiers to live beyond
    their income, and gradually reduced them to depend on his bounty
    for the means of subsistence. This was a plague which, once introduced,
    became a scourge to the whole country, for it did not take long
    to spread to Paris, and thence to the armies and the provinces;
    so that a man of any position is now estimated entirely according
    to his expenditure on his table and other luxuries. This folly,
    sustained by pride and ostentation, has already produced widespread
    confusion; it threatens to end in nothing short of ruin and a
    general overthrow. 
   
   From The Memoirs of the Duke de Saint-Simon, ed. F. Arkwright
    (New York Brentano's, n.d.), Vol. V, pp. 254, 259-63, 271-274,
    276-278 
     
   
   
   This text is part of the Internet Modern History Sourcebook.
    The Sourcebook is a collection of public domain and copy-permitted
    texts for introductory level classes in modern European and World
    history.  
   Unless otherwise indicated the specific electronic form of the
    document is copyright. Permission is granted for electronic copying,
    distribution in print form for educational purposes and personal
    use. If you do reduplicate the document, indicate the source.
    No permission is granted for commercial use of the Sourcebook.  
   (c)Paul Halsall Aug 1997  
        
   
   
 
The Internet History Sourcebooks Project is located at the History Department of  Fordham University, New York. The Internet
  Medieval Sourcebook, and other medieval components of the project, are located at
  the Fordham University Center
    for Medieval Studies.The IHSP recognizes the contribution of Fordham University, the
  Fordham University History Department, and the Fordham Center for Medieval Studies in
  providing web space and server support for the project. The IHSP is a project independent of Fordham University.  Although the IHSP seeks to follow all applicable copyright law, Fordham University is not
  the institutional owner, and is not liable as the result of any legal action. 
   
  
    © Site Concept and Design: Paul Halsall  created 26 Jan 1996: latest revision 20 Oct 2025 [CV] 
   
    |