To All the Bishops Everywhere, Beloved in the Holy Ghost, Our
Venerable, Most Dear Brethren; and to their Most Pious Clergy; and to All the Genuine
Orthodox Sons of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church: Brotherly Salutation in the
Holy Spirit, and Every Good From God, and Salvation.
The holy, evangelical and divine Gospel of Salvation should be set forth by all in its
original simplicity, and should evermore be believed in its unadulterated purity, even the
same as it was revealed to His holy Apostles by our Savior, who for this very cause,
descending from the bosom of God the Father, made Himself of no reputation and took
upon Him the form of a servant (Phil. ii. 7); even the same, also, as those Apostles,
who were ear and eye witnesses, sounded it forth, like clear-toned trumpets, to all that
are under the sun (for their sound is gone out into all lands, and their words into the
ends of the world); and, last of all, the very same as the many great and
glorious Fathers of the Catholic Church in all parts of the earth, who heard those
Apostolic voices, both by their synodical and their individual teachings handed it down to
all everywhere, and even unto us. But the Prince of Evil, that spiritual enemy of man's
salvation, as formerly in Eden, craftily assuming the pretext of profitable counsel, he
made man to become a transgressor of the divinely-spoken command. so in the spiritual
Eden, the Church of God, he has from time to time beguiled many; and, mixing the
deleterious drugs of heresy with the clear streams of orthodox doctrine, gives of the
potion to drink to many of the innocent who live unguardedly, not giving earnest heed
to the things they have heard (Heb. ii. 10), and to what they have been told by
their fathers (Deut. xxxii. 7), in accordance with the Gospel and in agreement with
the ancient Doctors; and who, imagining that the preached and written Word of the LORD and
the perpetual witness of His Church are not sufficient for their souls' salvation,
impiously seek out novelties, as we change the fashion of our garments, embracing a
counterfeit of the evangelical doctrine.
§ 2. Hence have arisen manifold and monstrous heresies, which the Catholic Church,
even from her infancy, taking unto her the whole armor of God, and assuming the sword
of the Spirit, which is the Word of God (Eph. vi. 13-17,) has been compelled to
combat. She has triumphed over all unto this day, and she will triumph for ever, being
manifested as mightier and more illustrious after each struggle.
§ 3. Of these heresies, some already have entirely failed, some are in decay,
some have wasted away, some yet flourish in a greater or less degree vigorous until the
time of their return to the Faith, while others are reproduced to run their course from
their birth to their destruction. For being the miserable cogitations and devices of
miserable men, both one and the other, struck with the thunderbolt of the anathema of the
seven Ecumenical Councils, shall vanish away, though they may last a thousand years; for
the orthodoxy of the Catholic and Apostolic Church, by the living Word of God, alone
endures for ever, according to the infallible promise of the LORD: the gates of hell
shall not prevail against it (Matt. xviii. 18). Certainly, the mouths of ungodly and
heretical men, however bold, however plausible and fair-speaking, however smooth they may
be, will not prevail against the orthodox doctrine winning, its way silently and without
noise. But, wherefore doth the way of the wicked prosper? (Jer. xii. 1.) Why are
the ungodly exalted and lifted up as the cedars of Lebanon (Ps. xxxvii. 35), to defile
the peaceful worship of God? The reason of this is mysterious, and the Church, though
daily praying that this cross, this messenger of Satan, may depart from her, ever hears
from the Lord: My grace is sufficient for thee, my strength is made perfect in
weakness (2. Cor. xii. 9). Wherefore she gladly glories in her infirmities, that
the power of Christ may rest upon her, and that they which are approved may be made
manifest (1. Cor. x. 19).
§ 4. Of these heresies diffused, with what sufferings the LORD hath known, over a
great part of the world, was formerly Arianism, and at present is the Papacy. This, too,
as the former has become extinct, although now flourishing, shall not endure, but pass
away and be cast down, and a great voice from heaven shall cry: It is cast down (Rev.
xii. 10).
§ 5. The new doctrine, that "the Holy Ghost proceedeth from the Father and the
Son," is contrary to the memorable declaration of our LORD, emphatically made
respecting it: which proceedeth from the Father (John xv. 26), and contrary to the
universal Confession of the Catholic Church as witnessed by the seven Ecumenical Councils,
uttering "which proceedeth from the Father." (Symbol of Faith).
i. This novel opinion destroys the oneness from the One cause, and the diverse origin
of the Persons of the Blessed Trinity, both of which are witnessed to in the Gospel.
ii. Even into the divine Hypostases or Persons of the Trinity, of equal power and
equally to be adored, it introduces diverse and unequal relations, with a confusion or
commingling of them.
iii. It reproaches as imperfect, dark, and difficult to be understood, the previous
Confession of the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church.
iv. It censures the holy Fathers of the first Ecumenical Synod of Nice and of the
second Ecumenical Synod at Constantinople, as imperfectly expressing what relates to the
Son and Holy Ghost, as if they had been silent respecting the peculiar property of each
Person of the Godhead, when it was necessary that all their divine properties should be
expressed against the Arians and Macedonians.
v. It reproaches the Fathers of the third, fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh Ecumenical
Councils, which had published over the world a divine Creed, perfect and complete, and
interdicted under dread anathemas and penalties not removed, all addition, or diminution,
or alteration, or variation in the smallest particular of it, by themselves or any
whomsoever. Yet was this quickly to be corrected and augmented, and consequently the whole
theological doctrine of the Catholic Fathers was to be subjected to change, as if,
forsooth, a new property even in regard to the three Persons of the Blessed Trinity had
been revealed.
vi. It clandestinely found an entrance at first in the Churches of the West, "a
wolf in sheep's clothing," that is, under the signification not of procession, according
to the Greek meaning in the Gospel and the Creed, but under the signification of mission, as Pope Martin explained it to the Confessor Maximus, and as Anastasius the Librarian
explained it to John VIII.
vii. It exhibits incomparable boldness, acting without authority, and forcibly puts a
false stamp upon the Creed, which is the common inheritance of Christianity.
viii. It has introduced huge disturbances into the peaceful Church of God, and divided
the nations.
ix. It was publicly proscribed, at its first promulgation, by two ever-to-be-remembered
Popes, Leo III and John VIII, the latter of whom, in his epistle to the blessed Photius,
classes with Judas those who first brought the interpolation into the Creed.
x. It has been condemned by many Holy Councils of the four Patriarchs of the East.
xi. It was subjected to anathema, as a novelty and augmentation of the Creed, by the
eighth Ecumenical Council, congregated at Constantinople for the pacification of the
Eastern and Western Churches.
xii. As soon as it was introduced into the Churches of the West it brought forth
disgraceful fruits, bringing with it, little by little, other novelties, for the most part
contrary to the express commands of our Savior in the Gospel—commands which till its
entrance into the Churches were closely observed. Among these novelties may be numbered
sprinkling instead of baptism, denial of the divine Cup to the Laity, elevation of one and
the same bread broken, the use of wafers, unleavened instead of real bread, the disuse of
the Benediction in the Liturgies, even of the sacred Invocation of the All-holy and
Consecrating Spirit, the abandonment of the old Apostolic Mysteries of the Church, such as
not anointing baptized infants, or their not receiving the Eucharist, the exclusion of
married men from the Priesthood, the infallibility of the Pope and his claim as Vicar of
Christ, and the like. Thus it was that the interpolation led to the setting aside of the
old Apostolic pattern of well nigh all the Mysteries and all doctrine, a pattern which the
ancient, holy, and orthodox Church of Rome kept, when she was the most honored part of the
Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church.
xiii. It drove the theologians of the West, as its defenders, since they had no ground
either in Scripture or the Fathers to countenance heretical teachings, not only into
misrepresentations of the Scriptures, such as are seen in none of the Fathers of the Holy
Catholic Church, but also into adulterations of the sacred and pure writings of the
Fathers alike of the East and West.
xiv. It seemed strange, unheard of, and blasphemous, even to those reputed Christian
communions, which, before its origin, had been for other just causes for ages cut off from
the Catholic fold.
xv. It has not yet been even plausibly defended out of the Scriptures, or with the
least reason out of the Fathers, from the accusations brought against it, notwithstanding
all the zeal and efforts of its supporters. The doctrine bears all the marks of error
arising out of its nature and peculiarities. All erroneous doctrine touching the Catholic
truth of the Blessed Trinity, and the origin of the divine Persons, and the subsistence of
the Holy Ghost, is and is called heresy, and they who so hold are deemed heretics,
according to the sentence of St. Damasus, Pope of Rome, who says: "If any one rightly
holds concerning the Father and the Son, yet holds not rightly of the Holy Ghost, he is an
heretic" (Cath. Conf. of Faith which Pope Damasus sent to Paulinus, Bishop of
Thessalonica). Wherefore the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church, following in the
steps of the holy Fathers, both Eastern and Western, proclaimed of old to our progenitors
and again teaches today synodically, that the said novel doctrine of the Holy Ghost
proceeding from the Father and the Son is essentially heresy, and its maintainers, whoever
they be, are heretics, according to the sentence of Pope St. Damasus, and that the
congregations of such are also heretical, and that all spiritual communion in worship of
the orthodox sons of the Catholic Church with such is unlawful. Such is the force of the
seventh Canon of the third Ecumenical Council.
§ 6. This heresy, which has united to itself many innovations, as has been said,
appeared about the middle of the seventh century, at first and secretly, and then under
various disguises, over the Western Provinces of Europe, until by degrees, creeping along
for four or five centuries, it obtained precedence over the ancient orthodoxy of those
parts, through the heedlessness of Pastors and the countenance of Princes. Little by
little it overspread not only the hitherto orthodox Churches of Spain, but also the
German, and French, and Italian Churches, whose orthodoxy at one time was sounded
throughout the world, with whom our divine Fathers such as the great Athanasius and
heavenly Basil conferred, and whose sympathy and fellowship with us until the seventh
Ecumenical Council, preserved unharmed the doctrine of the Catholic and Apostolic Church.
But in process of time, by envy of the devil, the novelties respecting the sound and
orthodox doctrine of the Holy Ghost, the blasphemy of whom shall not be forgiven unto men
either in this world or the next, according to the saying of our Lord (Matt. xii. 32), and
others that succeeded respecting the divine Mysteries, particularly that of the
world-saving Baptism, and the Holy Communion, and the Priesthood, like prodigious births,
overspread even Old Rome; and thus sprung, by assumption of special distinctions in the
Church as a badge and title, the Papacy. Some of the Bishops of that City, styled Popes,
for example Leo III and John VIII, did indeed, as has been said, denounce the innovation,
and published the denunciation to the world, the former by those silver plates, the latter
by his letter to the holy Photius at the eighth Ecumenical Council, and another to
Sphendopulcrus, by the hands of Methodius, Bishop of Moravia. The greater part, however,
of their successors, the Popes of Rome, enticed by the antisynodical privileges offered
them for the oppression of the Churches of God, and finding in them much worldly
advantage, and "much gain," and conceiving a Monarchy in the Catholic Church and
a monopoly of the gifts of the Holy Ghost, changed the ancient worship at will, separating
themselves by novelties from the old received Christian Polity. Nor did they cease their
endeavors, by lawless projects (as veritable history assures us), to entice the other four
Patriarchates into their apostasy from Orthodoxy, and so subject the Catholic Church to
the whims and ordinances of men.
§ 7. Our illustrious predecessors and fathers, with united labor and counsel, seeing
the evangelical doctrine received from the Fathers to be trodden under foot, and the robe
of our Savior woven from above to be torn by wicked hands, and stimulated by fatherly and
brotherly love, wept for the desolation of so many Christians for whom Christ died. They
exercised much zeal and ardor, both synodically and individually, in order that the
orthodox doctrine of the Holy Catholic Church being saved, they might knit together as far
as they were able that which had been rent; and like approved physicians they consulted
together for the safety of the suffering member, enduring many tribulations, and
contempts, and persecutions, if haply the Body of Christ might not be divided, or the
definitions of the divine and august Synods be made of none effect. But veracious history
has transmitted to us the relentlessness of the Western perseverance in error. These
illustrious men proved indeed on this point the truth of the words of our holy father
Basil the sublime, when he said, from experience, concerning the Bishops of the West, and
particularly of the Pope: "They neither know the truth nor endure to learn it,
striving against those who tell them the truth, and strengthening themselves in their
heresy" (to Eusebius of Samosata). Thus, after a first and second brotherly
admonition, knowing their impenitence, shaking them off and avoiding them, they gave them
over to their reprobate mind. "War is better than peace, apart from God," as
said our holy father Gregory, concerning the Arians. From that time there has been no
spiritual communion between us and them; for they have with their own hands dug deep the
chasm between themselves and Orthodoxy.
§ 8. Yet the Papacy has not on this account ceased to annoy the peaceful Church of
God, but sending out everywhere so-called missionaries, men of reprobate minds, it compasses
land and sea to make one proselyte, to deceive one of the Orthodox, to corrupt the
doctrine of our LORD, to adulterate, by addition, the divine Creed of our holy Faith, to
prove the Baptism which God gave us superfluous, the communion of the Cup void of sacred
efficacy, and a thousand other things which the demon of novelty dictated to the
all-daring Schoolmen of the Middle Ages and to the Bishops of the elder Rome, venturing
all things through lust of power. Our blessed predecessors and fathers, in their piety,
though tried and persecuted in many ways and means, within and without, directly and
indirectly, "yet confident in the LORD," were able to save and transmit to us
this inestimable inheritance of our fathers, which we too, by the help of God, will
transmit as a rich treasure to the generations to come, even to the end of the world. But
notwithstanding this, the Papists do not cease to this day, nor will cease, according to
wont, to attack Orthodoxy,—a daily living reproach which they have before their eyes,
being deserters from the faith of their fathers. Would that they made these aggressions
against the heresy which has overspread and mastered the West. For who doubts that had
their zeal for the overthrow of Orthodoxy been employed for the overthrow of heresy and
novelties, agreeable to the God-loving counsels of Leo III and John VIII, those glorious
and last Orthodox Popes, not a trace of it, long ago, would have been remembered under the
sun, and we should now be saying the same things, according to the Apostolic promise. But
the zeal of those who succeeded them was not for the protection of the Orthodox Faith, in
conformity with the zeal worthy of all remembrance which was in Leo III., now among the
blessed.
§ 9. In a measure the aggressions of the later Popes in their own persons had ceased,
and were carried on only by means of missionaries. But lately, Pius IX., becoming Bishop
of Rome and proclaimed Pope in 1847, published on the sixth of January, in this present
year, an Encyclical Letter addressed to the Easterns, consisting of twelve pages in the
Greek version, which his emissary has disseminated, like a plague coming from without,
within our Orthodox Fold. In this Encyclical, he addresses those who at different times
have gone over from different Christian Communions, and embraced the Papacy, and of course
are favorable to him, extending his arguments also to the Orthodox, either particularly or
without naming them; and, citing our divine and holy Fathers (p. 3, 1.14-18; p. 4, 1.19;
p. 9, 1.6; and pp. 17, 23), he manifestly calumniates them and us their successors and
descendants: them, as if they admitted readily the Papal commands and rescripts without
question because issuing from the Popes is undoubted arbiters of the Catholic Church; us,
as unfaithful to their examples (for thus he trespasses on the Fold committed to us by
God), as severed from our Fathers, as careless of our sacred trusts, and of the soul's
salvation of our spiritual children. Usurping as his own possession the Catholic Church of
Christ, by occupancy, as he boasts, of the Episcopal Throne of St. Peter, he desires to
deceive the more simple into apostasy from Orthodoxy, choosing for the basis of all
theological instruction these paradoxical words (p. 10, 1.29): "nor is there any
reason why ye refuse a return to the true Church and Communion with this my holy
Throne."
§10. Each one of our brethren and sons in Christ who have been piously brought up and
instructed, wisely regarding the wisdom given him from God, will decide that the words of
the present Bishop of Rome, like those of his schismatical predecessors, are not words of
peace, as he affirms (p. 7,1.8), and of benevolence, but words of deceit and guile,
tending to self-aggrandizement, agreeably to the practice of his antisynodical
predecessors. We are therefore sure, that even as heretofore, so hereafter the Orthodox
will not be beguiled. For the word of our LORD is sure (John x. 5), A stranger will
they not follow, but flee from him, for they know not the voice of strangers.
§11. For all this we have esteemed it our paternal and brotherly need, and a sacred
duty, by our present admonition to confirm you in the Orthodoxy you hold from your
forefathers, and at the same time point out the emptiness of the syllogisms of the Bishop
of Rome, of which he is manifestly himself aware. For not from his Apostolic Confession
does he glorify his Throne, but from his Apostolic Throne seeks to establish his dignity,
and from his dignity, his Confession. The truth is the other way. The Throne of Rome is
esteemed that of St. Peter by a single tradition, but not from Holy Scripture, where the
claim is in favor of Antioch, whose Church is therefore witnessed by the great Basil (Ep.
48 Athan.) to be "the most venerable of all the Churches in the world." Still
more, the second Ecumenical Council, writing to a Council of the West (to the most
honorable and religious brethren and fellow-servants, Damasus, Ambrose, Britto, Valerian,
and others), witnesseth, saying: "The oldest and truly Apostolic Church of Antioch,
in Syria, where first the honored name of Christians was used." We say then that the
Apostolic Church of Antioch had no right of exemption from being judged according to
divine Scripture and synodical declarations, though truly venerated for the throne of St.
Peter. But what do we say? The blessed Peter, even in his own person, was judged before
all for the truth of the Gospel, and, as Scripture declares, was found blamable and not
walking uprightly. What opinion is to be formed of those who glory and pride themselves
solely in the possession of his Throne, so great in their eyes? Nay, the sublime Basil the
great, the Ecumenical teacher of Orthodoxy in the Catholic Church, to whom the Bishops of
Rome are obliged to refer us (p. 8, 1.31), has clearly and explicitly above (§ 7) shown
us what estimation we ought to have of the judgments of the inaccessible
Vatican:—"They neither," he says, "know the truth, nor endure to learn
it, striving against those who tell them the truth, and strengthening themselves in their
heresy." So that these our holy Fathers whom his Holiness the Pope, worthily admiring
as lights and teachers even of the West, accounts as belonging to us, and advises us (p.
8) to follow, teach us not to judge Orthodoxy from the holy Throne, but the Throne itself
and him that is on the Throne by the sacred Scriptures, by Synodical decrees and
limitations, and by the Faith which has been preached, even the Orthodoxy of continuous
teaching. Thus did our Fathers judge and condemn Honorius, Pope of Rome, and Dioscorus,
Pope of Alexandria, and Macedonius and Nestorius, Patriarchs of Constantinople, and Peter
Gnapheus, Patriarch of Antioch, with others. For if the abomination of desolation stood
in the Holy Place, why not innovation and heresy upon a holy Throne? Hence is
exhibited in a brief compass the weakness and feebleness of the efforts in behalf of the
despotism of the Pope of Rome. For, unless the Church of Christ was founded upon the
immovable rock of St. Peter’s Confession, Thou art the Christ, the Son of
the Living God (which was the answer of the Apostles in common, when the question was
put to them, Whom say ye that I am? (Matt. xvi. 15,) as the Fathers, both Eastern
and Western, interpret the passage to us), the Church was built upon a slippery
foundation, even on Cephas himself, not to say on the Pope, who, after monopolizing the
Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven, has made such an administration of them as is plain from
history. But our divine Fathers, with one accord, teach that the sense of the
thrice-repeated command, Feed my sheep, implied no prerogative in St. Peter over
the other Apostles, least of all in his successors. It was a simple restoration to his
Apostleship, from which he had fallen by his thrice-repeated denial. St. Peter himself
appears to have understood the intention of the thrice-repeated question of our Lord: Lovest
thou Me, and more, and than these?. (John xxi. 16;) for, calling to mind
the words, Thou all shall be offended because of Thee, yet will 1 never be offended
(Matt. xxvi. 33), he was grieved because He said unto him the third time,
Lovest thou Me? But his successors, from self-interest, understand the expression as
indicative of St. Peter's more ready mind.
§12. His Holiness the Pope says (p. viii. 1.12.) that our LORD said to Peter (Luke
xxii. 32), I have prayed for thee, that thy faith fail not: and when thou art
converted, strengthen thy brethren. Our LORD so prayed because Satan had sought to
overthrow the faith of all the disciples, but the LORD allowed him Peter only, chiefly
because he had uttered words of boasting, and justified himself above the rest (Matt.
xxvi. 33): Though all shall be offended, because of thee, yet will I never be offended. The permission to Satan was but temporary. He began to curse and to swear: I know
not the man. So weak is human nature, left to itself. The spirit is willing,
but the flesh is weak. It was but temporary, that, coming again to himself by his
return in tears of repentance, he might the rather strengthen his brethren who had neither
perjured themselves nor denied. Oh! the wise judgment of the LORD! How divine and
mysterious was the last night of our Savior upon earth! That sacred Supper is believed to
be consecrated to this day in every Church: This do in remembrance of me (Luke
xxii. 19), and As often as ye eat this bread and drink this cup, ye do show the
LORD's death till he come (1 Cor. xi. 26). Of the brotherly love thus earnest1y
commended to us by the common Master, saying, By this shall all men know that ye are my
disciple, if ye have love one to another (John xiii. 35), have the Popes first broken
the stamp and seal, supporting and receiving heretical novelties, contrary to the things
delivered to us and canonically confirmed by our Teachers and Fathers in common. This love
acts at this day with power in the souls of Christian people, and particularly in their
leaders. We boldly avow before God and men, that the prayer of our Savior (p. ix. l.43) to
God and His Father for the common love and unity of Christians in the One Holy Catholic
and Apostolic Church, in which we believe, that they may be one, ever as we are one (John
xvii. 22), worketh in us no less than in his Holiness. Our brotherly love and zeal meet
that of his Holiness, with only this difference, that in us it worketh for the covenanted
preservation of the pure, undefiled, divine, spotless, and perfect Creed of the Christian
Faith, in conformity to the voice of the Gospel and the decrees of the seven holy
Ecumenical Synods and the teachings of the ever-existing Catholic Church: but worketh in
his Holiness to prop and strengthen the authority and dignity of them that sit on the
Apostolic Throne, and their new doctrine. Behold then, the head and front, so to speak, of
all the differences and disagreements that have happened between us and them, and the
middle wall of partition, which we hope will be taken away in the time of is Holiness, and
by the aid of his renowned wisdom, according to the promise of God (St. John x. 16):
"Other sheep I have which are not of this fold: them also 1 must bring and they shall
hear my voice (Who proceedeth from the Father "). Let it be said
then, in the third place, that if it be supposed, according to the words of his Holiness,
that this prayer of our LORD for Peter when about to deny and perjure himself, remained
attached and united to the Throne of Peter, and is transmitted with power to those who
from time to time sit upon it, although, as has before been said, nothing contributes to
confirm the opinion (as we are strikingly assured from the example of the blessed Peter
himself, even after the descent of the Holy Ghost, yet are we convinced from the words of
our LORD, that the time will come when that divine prayer concerning the denial of Peter,
"that his faith might not fail for ever" will operate also in some one of the
successors of his Throne, who will also weep, as he did, bitterly, and being sometime
converted will strengthen us, his brethren, still more in the Orthodox Confession, which
we hold from our forefathers;—and would that his Holiness might be this true
successor of the blessed Peter! To this our humble prayer, what hinders that we should add
our sincere and hearty Counsel in the name of the Holy Catholic Church? We dare not say,
as does his Holiness (p. x. 1.22), that it should be done "without any delay;"
but without haste, utter mature consideration, and also, if need be, after consultation
with the more wise, religious, truth-loving, and prudent of the Bishops, Theologians, and
Doctors, to be found at the present day, by God's good Providence, in every nation of the
West.
§ 13. His Holiness says that the Bishop of Lyons, St. Irenaeus, writes in praise of
the Church of Rome: "That the whole Church, namely, the faithful from everywhere,
must come together in that Church, because of its Primacy, in which Church the tradition,
given by the Apostles, has in all respects been observed by the faithful everywhere."
Although this saint says by no means what the followers of the Vatican would make out, yet
even granting their interpretation, we reply: Who denies that the ancient Roman Church was
Apostolic and Orthodox? None of us will question that it was a model of orthodoxy. We will
specially add, for its greater praise, from the historian Sozomen (Hist. Eccl. lib. iii.
cap. 12), the passage, which his Holiness has overlooked, respecting the mode by which for
a time she was enabled to preserve the orthodoxy which we praise:—"For, as
everywhere," saith Sozomen, "the Church throughout the West, being guided
purely by the doctrines of the Fathers, was delivered from contention and deception
concerning these things." Would any of the Fathers or ourselves deny her canonical
privilege in the rank of the hierarchy, so long as she was guided purely by the
doctrines of the Fathers, walking by the plain rule of Scripture and the holy Synods!
But at present we do not find preserved in her the dogma of the Blessed Trinity according
to the Creed of the holy Fathers assembled first in Nicea and afterwards in
Constantinople, which the other five Ecumenical Councils confessed and confirmed with such
anathemas on those who adulterated it in the smallest particular, as if they had thereby
destroyed it. Nor do we find the Apostolical pattern of holy Baptism, nor the Invocation
of the consecrating Spirit upon the holy elements: but we see in that Church the
eucharistic Cup, heavenly drink, considered superfluous, (what profanity!) and very many
other things, unknown not only to our holy Fathers, who were always entitled the catholic,
clear rule and index of Orthodoxy, as his Holiness, revering the truth, himself teaches
(p. vi), but also unknown to the ancient holy Fathers of the West. We see that very
primacy, for which his Holiness now contends with all his might, as did his predecessors,
transformed from a brotherly character and hierarchical privilege into a lordly
superiority. What then is to be thought of his unwritten traditions, if the written have
undergone such a change and alteration for the worse ? Who is so bold and confident in the
dignity of the Apostolic Throne, as to dare to say that if our holy Father, Sr. Irenaeus,
were alive again, seeing it was fallen from the ancient and primitive teaching in so many
most essential and catholic articles of Christianity, he would not be himself the first to
oppose the novelties and self-sufficient constitutions of that Church which was lauded by
him as guided purely by the doctrines of the Fathers? For instance, when he saw the
Roman Church not only rejecting from her Liturgical Canon, according to the suggestion of
the Schoolmen, the very ancient and Apostolic invocation of the Consecrating Spirit, and
miserably mutilating the Sacrifice in its most essential part, but also urgently hastening
to cut it out from the Liturgies of other Christian Communions also,—his Holiness
slanderously asserting, in a manner so unworthy of the Apostolic Throne on which he boasts
himself, that it "crept in after t.he division between the East and West" (p.
xi. 1.11)—what would not the holy Father say respecting this novelty ? Irenaeus
assures us (lib. iv. c. 34) "that bread, from the ground, receiving the evocation of
God, is no longer common bread," etc., meaning by "evocation" invocation: for that Irenaeus believed the Mystery of the Sacrifice to be consecrated by means of
this invocation is especially remarked even by Franciscus Feu-Ardentius, of the order of
popish monks called Minorites, who in 1639 edited the writings of that saint with
comments, who says (lib. i. c. 18, p. 114,) that Irenaeus teaches "that the bread and
mixed cup become the true Body and Blood of Christ by the words of invocation." Or,
hearing of the vicarial and appellate jurisdiction of the Pope, what would not the Saint
say, who, for a small and almost indifferent question concerning the celebration of Easter
(Euseb. Eccl. Hist. v. 26), so boldly and victoriously opposed and defeated the violence
of Pope Victor in the free Church of Christ? Thus he who is cited by his Holiness as a
witness of the primacy of the Roman Church, shows that its dignity is not that of a
lordship, nor even appellate, to which St. Peter himself was never ordained, but is a
brotherly privilege in the Catholic Church, and an honor assigned the Popes on account of
the greatness and privilege of the City. Thus, also, the fourth Ecumenical Council, for
the preservation of the gradation in rank of Churches canonically established by the third
Ecumenical Council (Canon 8),—following the second (Canon 3), as that again followed
the first (Canon 6), which called the appellate jurisdiction of the Pope over the West a Custom,—thus
uttered its determination: "On account of that City being the Imperial City, the
Fathers have with reason given it prerogatives" (Canon 28). Here is nothing said of
the Pope's special monopoly of the Apostolicity of St. Peter, still less of a vicarship in
Rome's Bishops, and an universal Pastorate. This deep silence in regard to such great
privileges—nor only so, but the reason assigned for the primacy, not "Feed my
sheep," not "On this rock will I build my Church," but simply
old Custom, and the City being the Imperial City; and these things, not from the LORD, but
from the Fathers—will seem, we are sure, a great paradox to his Holiness entertaining
other ideas of his prerogatives. The paradox will be the greater, since, as we shall see,
he greatly honors the said fourth Ecumenical Synod as one to be found a witness for his
Throne; and St. Gregory, the eloquent, called the Great (lib. i. Ep. 25), was wont to
speak of the four (Ecumenical Councils [not the Roman See] as the four Gospels, and the
four-sided stone on which the Catholic Church is built.
§14. His Holiness says (p. ix. 1.12) that the Corinthians, divided among themselves,
referred the matter to Clement, Pope of Rome, who wrote to them his decision on the case;
and they so prized his decision that they read it in the Churches. But this event is a
very weak support for the Papal authority in the house of God. For Rome being then the
center of the Imperial Province and the chief City, in which the Emperors lived, it was
proper that any question of importance, as history shows that of the Corinthians to have
been, should be decided there, especially if one of the contending parties ran thither for
external aid: as is done even to this day. The Patriarchs of Alexandria, Antioch, and
Jerusalem, when unexpected points of difficulty arise, write to the Patriarch of
Constantinople, because of its being the seat of Empire, as also on account of its
synodical privileges; and if this brotherly aid shall rectify that which should be
rectified, it is well; but if not, the matter is reported to the province, according to
the established system. But this brotherly agreement in Christian faith is not purchased
by the servitude of the Churches of God. Let this be our answer also to the examples of a
fraternal and proper championship of the privileges of Julius and Innocent Bishops of
Rome, by St. Athanasius the Great and St. John Chrysostom, referred to by his Holiness (p.
ix. 1. 6,17), for which their successors now seek to recompense us by adulterating the
divine Creed. Yet was Julius himself indignant against some for " disturbing the
Churches by not maintaining the doctrines of Nice" (Soz. Hist. Ec. lib. iii. c. 7),
and threatening (id.) excommunication, "if they ceased not their innovations."
In the case of the Corinthians, moreover, it is to be remarked that the Patriarchal
Thrones being then but three, Rome was the nearer and more accessible to the Corinthians,
to which, therefore, it was proper to have resort. In all this we see nothing
extraordinary, nor any proof of the despotic power of the Pope in the free Church of God.
§15. But, finally, his Holiness says (p. ix. l.12) that the fourth Ecumenical Council
(which by mistake he quite transfers from Chalcedon to Carthage), when it read the epistle
of Pope Leo I, cried out, "Peter has thus spoken by Leo." It was so indeed. But
his Holiness ought not to overlook how, and after what examination, our fathers cried out,
as they did, in praise of Leo. Since however his Holiness, consulting brevity, appears to
have omitted this most necessary point, and the manifest proof that an Ecumenical Council
is not only above the Pope but above any Council of his, we will explain to the public the
matter as it really happened. Of more than six hundred fathers assembled in the Counci1 of
Chalcedon, about two hundred of the wisest were appointed by the Council to examine both
as to language and sense the said epistle of Leo; nor only so, but to give in writing and
with their signatures their own judgment upon it, whether it were orthodox or not. These,
about two hundred judgments and resolution on the epistle, as chiefly found in the Fourth
Session of the said holy Council in such terms as the following:—"Maximus of
Antioch in Syria said: 'The epistle of the holy Leo, Archbishop of Imperial Rome, agrees
with the decisions of the three hundred and eighteen holy fathers at Nice, and the hundred
and fifty at Constantinople, which is new Rome, and with the faith expounded at Ephesus by
the most holy Bishop Cyril: and I have subscribed it."
And again:
"Theodoret,the most religious Bishop of Cyrus: 'The epistle of the most holy
Archbishop, the lord Leo, agrees with the faith established at Nice by the holy and
blessed fathers, and with the symbol of faith expounded at Constantinople by the hundred
and fifty, and with the epistles of the blessed Cyril. And accepting it, I have subscribed
the said epistle."'
And thus all in succession: "The epistle corresponds," "the epistle is
consonant,"the epistle agrees in sense," and the like. After such great and very
severe scrutiny in comparing it with former holy Councils, and a full conviction of the
correctness of the meaning, and not merely because it was the epistle of the Pope, they
cried aloud, ungrudgingly, the exclamation on which his Holiness now vaunts himself: But
if his Holiness had sent us statements concordant and in unison with the seven holy
Ecumenical Councils, instead of boasting of the piety of his predecessors lauded by our
predecessors and fathers in an Ecumenical Council, he might justly have gloried in his own
orthodoxy, declaring his own goodness instead of that of his fathers. Therefore let his
Holiness be assured, that if, even now, he will write us such things as two hundred
fathers on investigation and inquiry shall find consonant and agreeing with the said
former Councils, then, we say, he shall hear from us sinners today, not only, "Peter
has so spoken," or anything of like honor, but this also, "Let the holy hand be
kissed which has wiped away the tears of the Catholic Church."
§16. And surely we have a right to expect from the prudent forethought of his
Holiness, a work so worthy the true successor of St. Peter, of Leo I, and also of Leo III,
who for security of the orthodox faith engraved the divine Creed unaltered upon
imperishable plates—a work which will unite the churches of the West to the holy
Catholic Church, in which the canonical chief seat of his Holiness, and the seats of all
the Bishops of the West remain empty and ready to be occupied. For the Catholic Church,
awaiting the conversion of the shepherds who have fallen off from her with their flocks,
does not separate in name only, those who have been privily introduced to the rulership by
the action of others, thus making little of the Priesthood. But we are expecting the
"word of consolation," and hope that he, as wrote St. Basil to St.Ambrose,
Bishop of Milan (Epis. b6), will "tread again the ancient footprints of the
fathers." Not without great astonishment have we read the said Encyclical letter to
the Easterns, in which we see with deep grief of soul his Holiness, famed for prudence,
speaking like his predecessors in schism, words that urge upon us the adulteration of our
pure holy Creed, on which the Ecumenical Councils have set their seal; and doing violence
to the sacred Liturgies, whose heavenly structure alone, and the names of those who framed
them, and their tone of reverend antiquity, and the stamp that was placed upon them by the
Seventh Ecumenical Synod (Act vi.), should have paralyzed him, and made him to turn aside
the sacrilegious and all-daring hand that has thus smitten the King of Glory. From these
things we estimate into what an unspeakable labyrinth of wrong and incorrigible sin of
revolution the papacy has thrown even the wiser and more godly Bishops of the Roman
Church, so that, in order to preserve the innocent, and therefore valued vicarial dignity,
as well as the despotic primacy and the things depending upon it, they know no other means
shall to insult the most divine and sacred things, daring everything for that one end.
Clothing themselves, in words, with pious reverence for "the most venerable
antiquity" (p. xi. 1.16), in reality there remains, within, the innovating temper;
and yet his Holiness really hears hard upon himself when he says that we "must cast
from us everything that has crept in among us since the Separation," (!) while he and
his have spread the poison of their innovation even into the Supper of our LORD. His
Holiness evidently takes it for granted that in the Orthodox Church the same thing has
happened which he is conscious has happened in the Church of Rome since the rise of the
Papacy: to wit, a sweeping change in all the Mysteries, and corruption from scholastic
subtleties, a reliance on which must suffice as an equivalent for our sacred Liturgies and
Mysteries and doctrines: yet all the while, forsooth, reverencing our "venerable
antiquity," and all this by a condescension entirely
Apostolic!—"without," as he says, "troubling us by any harsh
conditions"! From such ignorance of the Apostolic and Catholic food on which we live
emanates another sententious declaration of his (p. vii. 1. 22): "It is not possible
that unity of doctrine and sacred observance should be preserved among you,"
paradoxically ascribing to us the very misfortune from which he suffers at home; just as
Pope Leo IX wrote to the blessed Michael Cerularius, accusing the Greeks of changing the
Creed of the Catholic Church, without blushing either for his own honor or for the truth
of history. We are persuaded that if his Holiness will call to mind ecclesiastical
archaeology and history, the doctrine of the holy Fathers and the old Liturgies of
France and Spain, and the Sacramentary of the ancient Roman Church, he will be struck with
surprise on finding how many other monstrous daughters, now living, the Papacy has brought
forth in the West: while Orthodoxy, with us, has preserved the Catholic Church as an
incorruptible bride for her Bridegroom, although we have no temporal power, nor, as his
Holiness says, any sacred "observances," but by the sole tie of love and
affection to a common Mother are bound together in the unity of a faith sealed with the
seven seals of the Spirit (Rev. v. 1), and by the seven Ecumenical Councils, and in
obedience to the Truth. He will find, also, flow many modern papistical doctrines and
mysteries must be rejected as "commandments of men" in order that the Church of
the West, which has introduced all sorts of novelties, may be changed back again to
the immutable Catholic Orthodox faith of our common fathers. As his Holiness recognizes
our common zeal in this faith, when he says (p. viii. l.30), "let us take heed to the
doctrine preserved by our forefathers," so he does well in instructing us (l. 31) to
follow the old pontiffs and the faithful of the Eastern Metropolitans. What these thought
of the doctrinal fidelity of the Archbishops of the elder Rome, and what idea we ought to
have of them in the Orthodox Church, and in what manner we ought to receive their
teachings, they have synodically given us an example (§ 15), and the sublime Basil has
well interpreted it (§ 7). As to the supremacy, since we are not setting forth a
treatise, let the same great Basil present the matter in a f'ew words, "I preferred
to address myself to Him who is Head over them."
§ 17. From all this, every one nourished in sound Catholic doctrine, particularly his
Holiness, must draw the conclusion, how impious and anti-synodical it is to attempt the
alteration of our doctrine and liturgies and other divine offices which are, and are
proved to be, coeval with the preaching of Christianity: for which reason reverence was
always bestowed on then, and they were confided in as pure even by the old orthodox Popes
themselves, to whom these things were an inheritance in common with ourselves. How
becoming and holy would be the mending of the innovations, the time of whose entrance in
the Church of Rome we know in each case; for our illustrious fathers have testified from
time to time against each novelty. But there are other reasons which should incline his
Holiness to this change. First, because those things that are ours were once venerable to
the Westerns, as having the same divine Offices and confessing the same Creed; but the
novelties were not known to our Fathers, nor could they be shown in the writings of the
orthodox Western Fathers, nor as having their origin either in antiquity or catholicity.
Moreover, neither Patriarchs nor Councils could then have introduced novelties amongst us,
because the protector of religion is the very body of the Church, even the people
themselves, who desire their religious worship to be ever unchanged and of the same kind
as that of their fathers: for as, after the Schism, many of the Popes and Latinizing
Patriarchs made attempts that came to nothing even in the Western Church; and as, from
time to time, either by fair means or foul, the Popes have commanded novelties for the
sake of expediency (as they have explained to our f'athers, although they were thus
dismembering the Body of Christ): so now again the Pope, for the sake of a truly divine
and most just expediency, forsooth (not mending the nets, but himself rending the garment
of the Savior), dare to oppose the venerable things of antiquity,—things well fitted
to preserve religion, as his Holiness confesses (p. xi. l.16), and which he himself
honors, as he says (lb. 1.16), together with his predecessors, for he repeats that
memorable expression o one of those blessed predecessors (Celestine, writing to the third
Ecumenical Council): "Let novelty cease to attack antiquity." And let the
Catholic Church enjoy this benefit from this so far blameless declaration of the Popes. It
must by all rneans be confessed, that in such his attempt, even though Pius IX be eminent
for wisdom and piety, and, as he says, for zeal after Christian unity in the Catholic
Church, he will meet, within and without, with difficulties and toils. And here we must
put his Holiness in mind, if he will excuse our boldness, of that portion of his letter
(p. viii. L.32), "That in things which relate to the confession of our divine
religion, nothing is to be feared, when we look to the glory of Christ, and the reward
which awaits us in eternal life." It is incumbent on his Holiness to show before God
and man, that, as prime mover of the counsel which pleases God, so is he a willing
protector of the ill-treated evangelical and synodical truth, even to the sacrifice of his
own interests, according to the Prophet (Is. lx. 17), A ruler in peace and a bishop
in righteousness. So be it! But until there be this desired returning of the
apostate Churches to the body of the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church, of which Christ
is the Head (Eph. iv. 15), and each of us "members in particular," all
advice proceeding from them, and every officious exhortation tending to the dissolution of
our pure faith handed down from the Fathers is condemned,as it ought to be, synodically,
not only as suspicious and to he eschewed, but as impious and soul-destroying: and in this
category, among the first we place the said Encyclical to the Easterns from Pope
Pius IX, Bishop of the elder Rome; and such we proclaim it to be in the Catholic Church.
§ 18. Wherefore, beloved brethren and fellow-ministers of our mediocrity, as always,
so also now, particularly on this occasion of the publication of the said Encyclical, we
hold it to be our inexorable duty, in accordance with our patriarchal and synodical
responsibility, in order that none may be lost to the divine fold of the Catholic Orthodox
Church, the most holy Mother of us all, to encourage each other, and to urge you that,
reminding one another of the words and exhortations of St. Paul to our holy predecessors
when he summoned them to Ephesus, we reiterate to each other: take heed, therefore,
unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over the which the Holy Ghost hath made you
overseers, to feed the Church of God, which He hath purchased with His own Blood.
For know this, that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you not
sparing the flock. Also of your own selves shall men arise, speaking perverse things, to
draw away disciples after them. Therefore,watch. (Acts xx.28-31.) Then our
predecessors and Fathers, hearing this divine charge, wept sore, and falling upon his
neck, kissed him. Come, then, and let us, brethren, hearing him admonishing us with tears,
fall in spirit, lamenting, upon his neck, and, kissing him, comfort him by our own firm
assurance, that no one shall separate us from the love of Christ, no one mislead us from
evangelical doctrine, no one entice us from the safe path of our fathers, as none was able
to deceive them, by any degree of zeal which they manifested, who from time to time were
raised up for this purpose by the tempter: so that at last we shall hear from the Master: Well
done, good and faithful servant, receiving the end of our faith, even the salvation of
our souls, and of the reasonable flock over whom the Holy Ghost has made us shepherds.
§ 19. This Apostolic charge and exhortation we have quoted for your sake, and address
it to all the Orthodox congregation, wherever they be found settled on the earth, to the
Priests and Abbots, to the Deacons and Monks, in a word, to all the Clergy and godly
People, the rulers and the ruled, the rich and the poor, to parents and children, to
teachers and scholars, to the educated and uneducated, to masters and servants, that we
all, supporting and counseling each other, may be able to stand against the wiles of
the devil. For thus St. Peter the Apostle exhorts us (1 Pet.): Be sober, be
vigilant because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion walketh about, seeking whom
he may devour. Whom resist, steadfast in the faith.
§ 20. For our faith, brethren, is not of men nor by man, but by revelation of Jesus
Christ, which the divine Apostles preached, the holy Ecumenical Councils confirmed, the
greatest and wisest teachers of the world handed down in succession, and the shed blood of
the holy martyrs ratified. Let us hold fast to the confession which we have
received unadulterated from such men, turning away from every novelty as a suggestion of
the devil. He that accepts a novelty reproaches with deficiency the preached Orthodox
Faith. But that Faith has long ago been sealed in completeness, not to admit of diminution
or increase, or any change whatever; and he who dares to do, or advise, or think of such a
thing has already denied the faith of Christ, has already of his own accord been struck
with an eternal anathema, for blaspheming the Holy Ghost as not having spoken fully in the
Scriptures and through the Ecumenical Councils. This fearful anathema, brethren and sons
beloved in Christ, we do not pronounce today, but our Savior first pronounced it (Matt.
xii. 32): Whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven
him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come. St. Paul pronounced the same
anathema (Gal. i. 6): I marvel that ye are so soon removed from Him that called you
into the grace of Christ, unto another Gospel: which is not another; but there be
some that trouble you, and would pervert the Gospel of Christ. But though we, or an
angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you, than that which we have preached unto
you, let him be accursed. This same anathema the Seven Ecumenical Councils and the
whole choir of God-serving fathers pronounced. All, therefore, innovating, either by
heresy or schism, have voluntarily clothed themselves, according to the Psalm (cix. 18), ("with a curse as with a garment,") whether they be Popes, or
Patriarchs, or Clergy, or Laity; nay, if any one, though an angel from heaven, preach any
other Gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed. Thus our wise
fathers, obedient to the soul-saving words of St. Paul, were established firm and
steadfast in the faith handed down unbrokenly to them, and preserved it unchanged and
uncontaminate in the midst of so many heresies, and have delivered it to us pure and
undefiled, as it came pure from the mouth of the first servants of the Word. Let us, too,
thus wise, transmit it, pure as we have received it, to coming generations, altering
nothing, that they may be, as we are, full of confidence, and with nothing to be ashamed
of when speaking of the faith of their forefathers.
§ 21. Therefore, brethren, and sons beloved in the LORD, having purified your souls
in obeying the truth (1 Pet. i. 22), let us give the more earnest heed to
the things which we have heard, lest at any time we should let them slip. (Heb. ii.
1.) The faith and confession we have received is not one to be ashamed of, being taught in
the Gospel from the mouth of our LORD, witnessed by the holy Apostles, by the seven sacred
Ecumenical Councils, preached throughout the world, witnessed to by its very enemies, who,
before they apostatized from orthodoxy to heresies, themselves held this same faith, or at
least their fathers and fathers' fathers thus held it. It is witnessed to by continuous
history, as triumphing over all the heresies which have persecuted or now persecute it, as
ye see even to this day. The succession of our holy divine fathers and predecessors
beginning from the Apostles, and those whom the Apostles appointed their successors, to
this day, forming one unbroken chain, and joining hand to hand, keep fast the sacred
inclosure of which the door is Christ, in which all the orthodox Flock is fed in the
fertile pastures of the mystical Eden, and not in the pathless and rugged wilderness, as
his Holiness supposes (p. 7.1.12). Our Church holds the infallible and genuine deposit of
the Holy Scriptures, of the Old Testament a true and perfect version, of the New the
divine original itself. The rites of the sacred Mysteries, and especially those of the
divine Liturgy, are the same glorious and heartquickening rites, handed down from the
Apostles. No nation, no Christian communion, can boast of such Liturgies as those of
James, Basil, Chrysostom. The august Ecumenical Councils, those seven pillars of the house
of Wisdom, were organized in it and among us. This, our Church, holds the originals of
their sacred definitions. The Chief Pastors in it, and the honorable Presbytery, and the
monastic Order, preserve the primitive and pure dignity of the first ages of Christianity,
in opinions, in polity, and even in the simplicity of their vestments. Yes! verily,
"grievous wolves" have constantly attacked this holy fold, and are attacking it
now, as we see for ourselves, according to the prediction of the Apostle, which shows that
the true lambs of the great Shepherd are folded in it; but that Church has sung and shall
sing forever: " They compassed me about; yea, they compassed me about: but in the
name of the Lord I will destroy them (Ps. cxviii. l1). Let us add one
reflection, a painful one indeed, but useful in order to manifest and confirm the truth of
our words:—All Christian nations whatsoever that are today seen calling upon the Name
of Christ (not excepting either the West generally, or Rome herself, as we prove by the
catalogue of her earliest Popes), were taught the true faith in Christ by our holy
predecessors and fathers; and yet afterwards deceitful men, many of whom were shepherds,
and chief shepherds too, of those nations, by wretched sophistries and heretical opinions
dared to defile, alas! the orthodoxy of those nations, as veracious history informs us,
and as St. Paul predicted.
§ 22. Therefore, brethren, and ye our spiritual children, we acknowledge how great the
favor and grace which God has bestowed upon our Orthodox Faith, and on His One, Holy,
Catholic, and Apostolic Church, which, like a mother who is unsuspected of her husband,
nourishes us as children of whom she is not ashamed, and who are excusable in our
high-toned boldness concerning the hope that is in us. But what shall we sinners
render to the LORD for all that He hath bestowed upon us? Our bounteous LORD and
God, who hath redeemed us by his own Blood, requires nothing else of us but the devotion
of our whole soul and heart to the blameless, holy faith of our fathers, and love and
affection to the Orthodox Church, which has regenerated us not with a novel sprinkling,
but with the divine washing of Apostolic Baptism. She it is that nourishes us, according
to the eternal covenant of our Savior, with His own precious Body, and abundantly, as a
true Mother, gives us to drink of that precious Blood poured out for us and for the
salvation of the world. Let us then encompass her in spirit, as the young their parent
bird, wherever on earth we find ourselves, in the north or south, or east, or west. Let us
fix our our eyes and thoughts upon her divine countenance and her most glorious beauty.
Let us take hold with both our hands on her shining robe which the Bridegroom,
"altogether lovely," has with His own undefiled hands thrown around her, when He
redeemed her from the bondage of error, and adorned her as an eternal Bride for Himself.
Let us feel in our own souls the mutual grief of the children-loving mother and the
mother-loving children, when it is seen that men of wolfish minds and making gain of souls
are zealous in plotting how they may lead her captive, or tear the lambs from their
mothers. Let us, Clergy as well as Laity, cherish this feeling most intensely now, when
the unseen adversary of our salvation, combining his fraudful arts (p. xi. 1. 2-25),
employs such powerful instrumentalities, and walketh about everywhere, as saith St. Peter, seeking whom he may devour; and when in this way, in which we walk peacefully and
innocently, he sets his deceitful snares.
§ 23. Now, the God of peace, "that brought again from the dead that great
Shepherd of the sheep," "He that keepeth Israel," who "shall neither
slumber nor sleep," "keep your hearts and minds," "and direct your
ways to every good work."
Peace and joy be with you in the LORD.
May, 1848, Indiction 6.
+ ANTHIMOS, by the Mercy of God, Archbishop of
Constantinople, new Rome, and Ecumenical Patriarch, a beloved brother in Christ our God,
and suppliant.
+ HIEROTHEUS, by the Mercy of God, Patriarch of Alexandria
and of all Egypt, a beloved brother in Christ our God, and suppliant.
+ METHODIOS, by the Mercy of God, Patriarch of the great
City of God, Antioch, and of all Anatolia, a beloved brother in Christ our God, and
suppliant.
+ CYRIL, by the Mercy of God, Patriarch of Jerusalem and of
all Palestine, a beloved brother in Christ our God, and suppliant.
The Holy Synod in Constantinople:
+ PAISIUS OF CAESAREA
+ ANTHIMUS OF EPHESUS
+ DIONYSIUS OF HERACLEA
+ JOACHIM OF CYZICUS
+ DIONYSIUS OF NICODEMIA
+ HIEROTHEUS OF CHALCEDON
+ NEOPHYTUS OF DERCI
+ GERASIMUS OF ADRIANOPLE
+ CYRIL OF NEOCAESAREA
+ THEOCLETUS OF BEREA
+ MELETIUS OF PISIDIA
+ ATHANASIUS OF SMYRNA
+ DIONYSIUS OF MELENICUS
+ PAISIUS OF SOPHIA
+ DANIEL OF LEMNOS
+ PANTELEIMON OF DEYINOPOLIS
+ JOSEPH OF ERSECIUM
+ ANTHIMUS OF BODENI
The Holy Synod in Antioch:
+ ZACHARIAS OF ARCADIA
+ METHODIOS OF EMESA
+ JOANNICIUS OF TRIPOLIS
+ ARTEMIUS OF LAODICEA
The Holy Synod in Jerusalem:
+ MELETIUS OF PETRA
+ DIONYSIUS OF BETHLEHEM
+ PHILEMON OF GAZA
+ SAMUEL OF NEAPOLIS
+ THADDEUS OF SEBASTE
+ JOANNICIUS OF PHILADELPHIA
+ HIEROTHEUS OF TABOR
Source:
http://www.orthodoxinfo.com/ecumenism/encyc_1848.htm
This text is part of the Internet
Modern History Sourcebook. The Sourcebook is a collection of public domain and
copy-permitted texts for introductory level classes in modern European and World history.
Unless otherwise indicated the specific electronic form of the document is copyright.
Permission is granted for electronic copying, distribution in print form for educational
purposes and personal use. If you do reduplicate the document, indicate the source. No
permission is granted for commercial use of the Sourcebook.
© Paul Halsall, November 1998
