Fordham University

 

Home | Ancient History Sourcebook | Medieval SourcebookModern History Sourcebook | Byzantine Studies Page
Other History Sourcebooks: African | East Asian | Global | Indian | IslamicJewishLesbian and Gay | Science | Women's


Modern History


Full Texts Multimedia Additions Search Help


Selected Sources Sections Studying History Reformation Early Modern World Everyday Life Absolutism Constitutionalism Colonial North America Colonial Latin America Scientific Revolution Enlightenment Enlightened Despots American Independence French Revolution Industrial Revolution Romanticism Conservative Order Nationalism Liberalism 1848 19C Britain 19C France 19C Germany 19C Italy 19C West Europe 19C East Europe Early US US Civil War US Immigration 19C US Culture Canada Australia & New Zealand 19C Latin America Socialism Imperialism Industrial Revolution II Darwin, Freud 19C Religion World War I Russian Revolution Age of Anxiety Depression Fascism Nazism Holocaust World War II Bipolar World US Power US Society Western Europe Since 1945 Eastern Europe Since 1945 Decolonization Asia Since 1900 Africa Since 1945 Middle East Since 1945 20C Latin America Modern Social Movements Post War Western Thought Religion Since 1945 Modern Science Pop Culture 21st Century
IHSP Credits
Modern History Sourcebook:
Kume Kunitake:
Records of My Visits to America and Europe, 1871-1873

Westerners think trade is the most important business in life, and this is why Asians call their countries mercantile. Yet in fact a majority of their population are engaged in agriculture, the rest chiefly in industry, and only five or six out of one hundred in trade. It is simply inconceivable for the people of the East that not only merchants but also farmers and manufacturers are interested in the exchange of goods, and that big cities are eager to have merchants and trading vessels visit their ports. There are businesses that are indispensable to trade and taken for granted at commercial centers such as docks, markets, banking and exchange facilities, and chambers of commerce. These simply do not exist in the Orient....In Japan there is, in contrast, general lack of interest in trade and ignorance of the fact that the essence of trade is to mediate between buying and selling and to transport goods to places which value them highly.

Possibilities for the further development of San Francisco seem limitless. It is a matter of fact that whenever one place flourishes in trade it brings forth prosperity in a corresponding place. London has been prosperous along with Paris, and these two cities have in turn brought forth the prosperity of New York and Philadelphia. Now geographically the ports that correspond to San Francisco in the East are Yokohama, Shanghai, and Hong Kong.... But while San Francisco on the eastern shores of the Pacific has been thriving, what can we say of the situation at the Japanese and Chinese ports on the western shores? We Japanese must certainly reflect on these matters. San Francisco has taken advantage of its favorable location and safe conditions of the bay. At the same time, it should be noted that its land is vast and its population sparse, with the result that the demand for manpower is enormous, both in industry and agriculture. The cost of labor is exorbitant. As a result the manufacturing industry in San Francisco has been underdeveloped, and it has been very costly to process timber, wool, leather, gold, and other kinds of metal. Glassware, chinaware, blankets, hats, shoes, silver and copper trinkets, leather instruments, lumber, and even salted fish are so expensive that they have had to be imported from New York, Boston, and Philadelphia. These goods are shipped through the Atlantic Ocean, the Gulf of Mexico, and the Isthmus of Panama. It is obviously much more inconvenient to ship goods across such distances than to send them from Japan. Now it happens that Japan as well as other countries of the Orient are endowed with natural resources, where the population is large and labor cheap, in other words a situation the exact opposite of San Francisco.

Thus it seems evident that trade between the Orient and San Francisco will serve to lessen prices of commodities in the latter city and bring about prosperity to both. California has large forests, but it imports wooden products from New York. It has a thriving dairy industry, but it turns to New York for leather goods. It has a long coast line, and yet buys salted fish from Canada. It is famous for mineral resources, and still imports jewels from other States. The situation will remain the same even in the event that California's population increases to one million; there still will be too much land to be opened up, and the cost of labor will never begin to go down. Thus trade with the Orient will not be confined to tea, silk, and tobacco. California's natural resources will be limitless, and manufactured products will continue to be expensive. Are these things not important for future trade? I sincerely hope that the reader will pay attention to them.


Source:

From: Kume Kunitake, Bei-O kairan jikki, 2 vols., trans. M. Iriye, (Tokyo, 1876), Vol. 1, pp. 72-82; reprinted in William H. McNeil and Mitsuko Iriye, eds., Modern Asia and Africa, Readings in World History Vol. 9, (New York: Oxford University Press, 1971), pp. 141-143.

Scanned by Jerome S. Arkenberg, Cal. State Fullerton. The text has been modernized by Prof. Arkenberg.


This text is part of the Internet Modern History Sourcebook. The Sourcebook is a collection of public domain and copy-permitted texts for introductory level classes in modern European and World history.

Unless otherwise indicated the specific electronic form of the document is copyright. Permission is granted for electronic copying, distribution in print form for educational purposes and personal use. If you do reduplicate the document, indicate the source. No permission is granted for commercial use of the Sourcebook.

© Paul Halsall, October 1998
halsall@murray.fordham.edu